Hate to break it to you bud, but the onous is on you to prove the opposite. The fact that you can't doesn't obviate your obligation to do so. See, when you argue against diversity, you are arguing for apartheid, whether you intend such or not-that's called recent history, and it's global in scale. Your ilk, the ones who believe in some kind of inherent value in apartheid, have been rather discredited by most of the last 75 years of history-around the world. You are the ones who have been trained to mouth words, you almost sound reasonable, if not for the context.
Are you done cryin your little eyes out privileged boy? Mighty fine racist sense there you got, but no it's not you-it's them "uppidy" N!5534's, how dare they forget their place, certainly not somewhere with such sweet gigs like Google.
Saying that you are against something because it violates principles of the free market is identical to the interview with the deathrow inmate who claimed Satan/God made me do it
Give me a fuckin break -name me one aspect, just one, when it comes to the automobile industry, which in anyway, ever, constituted a "free market"
You know if your opposition to something is based on Principles that have no basis in any reality that anyone can discern, then your opposition is actually based on something entirely unrelated. This is what kills me about some large number of Republicans and their intellectual avant-garde, the libertarians. There is nothing wrong with principled opposition. Sometimes it is absolutely invauable. But the so-called Principles of the "free market" and "free trade" are pure ideological bullshit. They always have been and always will be. Hell, none other than Karl Marx hosted a regular column in the New York Times back in the 1850's writing about the bullshit sold in the name of free markets/free trade. Now given that 8-9 generations of Americans have continuously bought hook line and seeker into this bullshit it is no surprise that the "conservatives" are most beholden to this bullshit. The intellectual dishonesty of %95 of elected politicans and %100 of current generations of Republicans makes me sick
Cry me a fucking river Fiat-Chrysler. Big bad government telling you what to do. I was not against the bailout of the car companies- the reason being with national unemployment at the time nominally over %10(and in reality closer to %20), the last thing we needed was to create another 1-2 million unemployed. But the auto bailout rewarded the exact same scum which had already bankrupted the auto industry, it also provided an oppurtunity to turn the screws on the beholden employees and utterly screw them even more. It was a rotten deal all around. The only thing more rotten than that was the status quo when all this went down. The big american auto companies had regressed every single year for a generation prior to this unfolding. Hell you couldn't buy an American car in the late 90's/early 2000's that could compete in terms of fuel efficiency with cars made by those same companies 20 years ealier. If those companies had kept advancing fuel economy starting back in the late 70's till today, none of their current models would even have a market. But no, they catered to the lowest common denominator=My Dick is bigger than yours. The original Robocop had it right-Detroit having been completely privatized by coporate takeover, the wealthy drove around in cars which carried the name SUX2000 which probably got the same mpg as the shit they produce today.
*But lest ye think I am a partisan Demcorats are the better Republicans (TM), at least when it comes to presidents. Republican presidents tend to be more restrained than their Democrat counterparts. Hell Clinton would have already have privatized social security if it wasn't for a certain blow job and cum-stained dress belonging to a young woman which ended up derailing his domestic agenda. Obama has done a a small number of trully good things and set a much better tone in our society than his predecessor, but on the issues which really count (injustices/day rating) he make Baby Bush look quite harmless. By my count there are less than 10 representatives/senators who don't buy into this bullshit and not one president during my lifetime. In 1992 I voted for Mikhail Gorbachov, fuck a bunch of NAFTA deja-vu TPP
Terrorism is a function of occupation. Every terrorist organization developed in the embryo of occupying forces: occupying forces being any forces not recognized at least by some large minority as being foreign=illegitimate.
Case 1: Al Quaeda. Born out of the ashes of the Afghanistani Muhajadeen, which was born out of the Soviet occupation of Afghanistan.
Case 2: IRA. Born out of the ashes of Brittish Occupation of Northern Island. Some %20-30 of local population historically having seeing Brittish as Foreign forces.
Case: ETA. Born out of Franco's fascist State, occupation of Basque country.
Case 4: Timothy Mcveigh. Born out of sovereign rights ideology. Sees Federal anything as occupying force.
Case 5: RAF. Saw post-WWII German Government and corporate leaders as part of a hidden/secret conspiracy in the continuation of Hitlers fascism.
Case 6: FARC. Never saw central government as legitimate, used ethnic and socio-economic differences to pit indigneous locals aginst governing class.
Ironically America has joined the ranks of terrorist organizations. America now claims the Earth as its jurisidiction and seeks to impose its will on all people everywhere. For some reason Americans see illegitimate people all over the world and are hunting them down. Apparently the world was occupied by foreign forces, who we deem illegitimate.
"Cheaper isn't bad, cheaper is typically good in fact. Cheaper means more people can afford it, and often without sacrificing quality."
No, cheaper is bad. Cheaper means the actual work preformed by raw resource workers, manufacturing workers, distributors, delivery personnell, sales associates etc. is itself valued as something cheap, which translates directly into exploitively low wages, inhuman/unsafe working conditions, and corrupt management.
In America when someone purchase something at a cheaper price than those around them, they are at once smug in their self-certainty that they are smarter than those around them and held by those same others as being respectively smarter. The name of the game in America is simple-he who pays the most for a given item, or service is the sucker, the loser.
Personally I like how the Germans look at cheap. They have two words for "cheap", billig and guenstig. Now "guenstig" connotes something having a good value, the price may be relatively low, but when one purchases some good or service which is seen as "guenstig" they don't have the feeling of getting a "steal", but rather a good deal. Billig, on the other hand, is seen as morally cheap, seen in expressions like billige Nutte(cheap whore/prostitute). Walmart, as a business model, failed in Germany, primarily because it's products were seen as billig, and in a society where cheap products=billige Produkte=billige Arbeitskraft(workers), that is a no-no. Additionally "billige Produkte" are also seen as things which are quickly consumed and then thrown away(Wegwerfgesellschaft), whereas guenstig things are treated with value and taken care of.
In America, however, we score social status points by getting ahead of one another primarily by our collective sense of shamelessness, the gleeful abandon with which we enjoy expoliting one another, and this starts by going and shopping at Walmart, bragging to friends about how much you saved and never thinking about how your taxes are providing food stamps for the underpaid workers who work there. Any time you save a penny on productive work, the rest of society has to pick up the tab and pay the bill.
It really is that simple, you can rationalize it this way or that way but you're just rationalizing.
and there is no fee for processing SNAP transactions on EBT cards. (It is illegal to charge sales tax or card processing fees on SNAP transactions)
Don't believe the hype. It may very by state to state but here in Kentucky Chase collects fees on every EBT transaction, which is why no small businesses except EBT/Credit Cards for purchases under $5/$10.00 in downtown Louisville.
Everybody with an IQ above room temperature knows that homeopathy is complete and utter bullshit.
My My our SlashJocks are out in force tonight.
It is really sad to see how absolutely certain some people are about things, particularly among people who should have enough IQ to *grasp* the real limits of our knowledge.
There is a profound lack of knowledge concerning most of the food we consume. I am not talking here about dumb consumers. I am talking about the scientific community as a whole. Most of the chemicals used in food production have never been subject to any real testing. Of the handful that have been tested the scientific community is utterly ignorant how such tested chemicals work in the presence of other tested and/or untested chemicals. It's not as if there had been exahustive scientific research which cleared chemicals for use in food production. The vast majority of chemicals that used to be used in food production which are no longer used were excluded from usage by discoveries in unrelated scientific research that determined possible health issues with said chemicals, but again they were not found to be unsafe by careful research of these chemicals in food production, by scientists who study food production and human health in regards to food consumption. Simply put our scientists know slightly more than enough to be dangerous, but only slightly. You state something with absolute certainty about homeopathic products.
- Yet there exists no scientific basis to draw such a conclusion
. The research simply hasn't been done. We do not now, nor have ever, nor will ever live in a world where scientists have performed exhaustive research into all of the chemicals used in production. When after the fact, after a product has been brought to markert and consumed by perhaps millions, we discover some health issues which we can directly correlate with the presence of a precise chemical in said products, we may take steps to ban or limit the usage of such chemicals. However the fact remains that the American public in general has been the testing grounds for industrialized food production for the better part of a century now. We are all guinea pigs in the great big experiment in modern food production. For all the knowledge that our Bio-sciences have produced in the last 50 years, we are still only beginning to scratch the suface of what is yet to be known. If you really want to be a stickler for *actual* scientific knowledge just go ahead and remove all the chemicals used in food production which have never had any *real* testing(as it pertains to the human body as used in food consumption), and then get back to me when the shelves are all empty.
oh well i was within the first 100 posts!....
the one time i am fooled into claiming it! and not even received with the humour intended! pffff!
omg! could this be my first, first post! Karma! yeah!
Good call Mark, glad to see Ubuntu embrace what is comming. Now, for the interesting part, it is time for sys admins to rally and push for the interfaces/workflows that we need. systemd obviously has certain strengths, now lets bring the experience and know how of good sys admins to make working with systemd mutually beneficial for all.
Common practice since the '60's on big machines(think mainframes)...
Hell, Ross Perot did that 2 generations ago with EDS
Of course back then they would send out a technician, who would vanish inside the mainframe to do the "memory upgrade", funnily enough the $10,000 "upgrade" was simply cutting a few resistors...
Thanks ALEC(American Leglislative Exchange Council)
Thanks Google, for joining ALEC and legitamizing Americas' true Shadow Government.
Thanks to all the State legislatures bought and paid for by ALEC
American land of the "free"(TM), home of the cowering masses of consumers beholden to mega-corporations.
Uneducated single mothers living in slums with 5+ kids should just get a better job. Advice from a white guy sitting in a suburban home in front of his expensive computer.
Damn you're good. I believe the niveau of armerican sarcasm/irony has finally reached a new hight(assuming you're american....)
I'm glad to hear AMD was selling 8088's before Intel developed them.
Please, pretty please let me see your 8088 based machine from 1975.
Damn am I getting that old!
I was jubilant when I read of how District Court Judge Susan Illston declared those damned National Security Letters unconstitutional. Despite the epic waves of psuedo-cynism, which apparently have overtaken slashdot today, as evidenced here, this is major step in the right direction. While everybody and their brother loves to hate on the government, regardless of the ruling party and their respective policies, the real culprit in the post 9/11 dementia, which held America in it's sway for more than a decade now, has been the "American people", who blindly obliged and acquiesced to every absurdity coming from congress and the executive.
The fact that is has taken so long for a judge to point out the most basic issue of constitutionallity in regards to NSL's is what is really incredible. Our federal judges have been so inept and so asleep-at-the-wheel for such a long time now people are almost shocked to see a judge actually point out what is painfully obvious- federal judges are not beholden to either congress or the executive branch. On one level federal judges are nominally governed by the Justice Department and Attorney General, both of which are functions of the executive branch of government, yet, more importantly, they answer ultimately only to the supreme court. The federal government can only tell a judge that they have no jurisdiction over a given law, if the judge buys into the notion that "father knows best" and is willing to allow the federal government absolute impunity in the name of national defense, ie. secrecy, which in the post 9/11 world has been used to justify almost everything.
This willingness to allow the federal government total impunity in the name of "security", on the basis that our "enemies" might win against us if actually follow our own constituion, where secrecy demands from the feds trumps every other right, is what has damaged our society-not the policies of the government-but that we let them get away with this bullshit, is the tragedy of what really happened post 9/11. If the citizens of this country are so craven in their apparent respect of authority then even a different administration, which perhaps was less likely to play the patriot card used so carelessly and frequently by the predecessor administration, will still be given to use the leeway that the citizens blindly handed over, because we let them get away with this bullshit.
Susan Illiston made the right call. The real proof for just how insanely authoritarian our current administration is will be shown if they attempt to fight this all the way to the supreme court. I doubt they will. I doubt it because they know that NSL's are unjust and indefensible, even if the government has been drunk on the power that NSL's have given them, and lord knows it is difficult for folks to walk away from power however unjustly granted.
It may take another decade for America to completely stand up after having been on our collective knees for so long, but this is an important step in that direction.