I work in sales. At my office, we call this more dollars than sense.

Pretty sure it's a lot when the sites are explaining how to open the terminal from the run command or Spotlight commands. I highly doubt that these bad actors are expecting the user to know how themselves and would expect they're giving them explicit instructions.

I work in an office where there are approximately ten Windows based computers and approximately 700 Mac Minis (plus a few dozen MacBook Pros). I can picture the office picking up laptops instead going forward, especially if we ever entertain WFH again.

Came here to complain about that wording as well.

Who said they were working in the first place?

The aforementioned judge's decision came in October of 2024.

Agreed.

You're really going to waste your and taxpayers' dollars to challenge a law like this in the state that requires just about everything to have a Prop 65 warning on it? Like, it's a long, running joke that people wear T-shirts with the Prop 65 warning on them because it's so prominent. You think you've got a fighting chance against this law in that state when so many products get a Prop 65 warning that don't really merit it?!

More like, "It's like March 1994 all over again."

[pedantic] Champagne is not a type of grape, it is a very specific region of France. Champagne as you're thinking of, is a sparkling wine only made in the aforementioned region, typically made with pinot noir, pinot meunier, and chardonnay grapes as the primary grape and various yeasts giving it its specific bubbles. So if a sparkling wine comes from anywhere other than Champagne, France, it is not champagne, merely sparkling wine. [/pendantic]

That would imply they're elite...

...what US public are you referring to as "an informed public"? As someone with a general public facing job in the US, I can assure you that the general population is not well informed.

Yeah...about that...a large plurality (48%) of the world's pharmaceuticals come from India. Next largest slice of the pie isn't the US, it's Europe (as a block, so kind of cheating) with 22%, then China with 13%, and then the US with 10% (remainder 7% comes from other nations). In the US alone, more than 10% of pharmaceuticals come from India. The US's pharma exports are a paltry 94.39 billion USD and imports on pharma are 212.67 billion USD, so acting like the US is the big powerhouse of reliable pharma feels disingenuous.

Your points about US exports often requiring a high degree of skill, education, and sometimes a trusted supply chain (referencing the trackers in the nVidia shipments for example), sound legitimately valid. Throwing the pharmaceutical example in there seems to (to my reading, at least) diminish those points.

The United States Department of Defense, the United States Navy, the nation of Iceland, Ernie Ball, the world's most valuable retailer, London Stock Exchange, and many more, just to name a few...