The most common side effect I've seen reported is nausea. Sometimes that can lead to vomiting, but it doesn't usually.
Pedantic point, but accurate, my apologies.
I rarely get nauseous without vomiting (in my adult life, I think I was nauseous without vomiting once so far) so I directly correlate the two. I do know people who experience that more regularly, so again, my apologies.
Wut? Where did you get vomit from?
It's actually the most common side effect of Wegovy. I don't like defending a troll, but that's actually one of the biggest problems people have with the drug. To the extent that many of the people that quit taking it attribute the nausea as the biggest reason outside of the cost.
Ellison could wring a buck out of roadkill.
Not if the Secretary of Health eats it first!
Na, he just leaves it.
...there's always a few with more money than brains...
I work in sales. At my office, we call this more dollars than sense.
I'm wondering what the overlap is in the Venn diagram of people smart enough to open the terminal window yet dumb enough to past random things into it?
Pretty sure it's a lot when the sites are explaining how to open the terminal from the run command or Spotlight commands. I highly doubt that these bad actors are expecting the user to know how themselves and would expect they're giving them explicit instructions.
I work in an office where there are approximately ten Windows based computers and approximately 700 Mac Minis (plus a few dozen MacBook Pros). I can picture the office picking up laptops instead going forward, especially if we ever entertain WFH again.
This is some AI slop generated summary of the article. While the article says "$144 million", the AI slop changed it to "a hundred and $44 million".
Came here to complain about that wording as well.
Until we can figure out what the hell is going on.
Who said they were working in the first place?
I wasn't aware Nov. 1st, 2027 is three years away.
The aforementioned judge's decision came in October of 2024.
That is a great analogy. Next time someone brings it up in person conversation, I think I'll use it.
Thanks
Agreed.
You're really going to waste your and taxpayers' dollars to challenge a law like this in the state that requires just about everything to have a Prop 65 warning on it? Like, it's a long, running joke that people wear T-shirts with the Prop 65 warning on them because it's so prominent. You think you've got a fighting chance against this law in that state when so many products get a Prop 65 warning that don't really merit it?!
It's like it's 1999 all over again.
More like, "It's like March 1994 all over again."
If champagne grapes don't grow in your region, switching to sparkling apple cider, is kinda the point here. Being recalcitrant and "saying see see muh chocolate bar costs more this isn't working," is rather missing the point entirely.
[pedantic] Champagne is not a type of grape, it is a very specific region of France. Champagne as you're thinking of, is a sparkling wine only made in the aforementioned region, typically made with pinot noir, pinot meunier, and chardonnay grapes as the primary grape and various yeasts giving it its specific bubbles. So if a sparkling wine comes from anywhere other than Champagne, France, it is not champagne, merely sparkling wine. [/pendantic]
I vote to call them the Sardaukar.
That would imply they're elite...
...maybe an informed public is now realizing that government economic data has always been unreliable?
...what US public are you referring to as "an informed public"? As someone with a general public facing job in the US, I can assure you that the general population is not well informed.
Quantity is no substitute for quality, but its the only one we've got.
