Haven't we known this since the '70s?
This has been known for 20+ years.
The problem is that most states don't allow the adverse party to introduce evidence on the general unreliability of eye-witness testimony.
If you have any idea what any of this is about, or who any of these people are, you're a loser.
NASA objective = welfare and graft
Indian objective = send something to Mars as cheaply as possible.
Don't do the crime if you can't do the time.
I agree with the FAA. Given the current state of cheap R/C copters with zip-tied Herocams, I don't think the operators should be given carte blanche to do as they please. The FAA needs to start rule-making process that involves all interested parties. But, until such rules are promulgated, I think prohibiting commercial operation is a sensible temporary position. Congress has the ultimate power here, but generally, the less they're involved - the better.
Just 5? Seems to me that in a country of 300,000,000 people, covert snooping on 5 is reasonable.
Didn't Shawn Fanning get the Nobel PRize like 15 years ago for setting music free?
I can just see Charlton Heston:
Any encryption in the hands of a decent person is no threat to anybody — except bad
Not a single firefox reference to be found.
The lowest of the low.
May have to get in line for the i7 model tomorrow.
Nothing beats lightning strike Socratic method lectures.
Sending a nasty email is not domestic abuse.
Stop trivializing the suffering of women that get beaten within a inch of their lives by brutal husbands.
I know female doctors make me nervous.