/but not as friends... because of reasons.
/but not as friends... because of reasons.
/Oh right, I don't have any friends. So no problem!
Slashdot encodes its page with latin1, so UTF8/unicode characters become "lost in translation".
There was a lengthy discussion of this on slashdot several (many?) years ago. I cannot seem to find it offhand.
Not to take away from your point that Monsanto is paying for branding via a newspaper, but the amount ($400k) is pretty miniscule. Last I checked the G&M annual revenues were over $250 million. They've written off CAD$400,000 accounts receivable without batting an eyelash. I'm not sure how much influence $400k will buy.
If the cause of honey bee hive collapse is a parasite or parasitoid then the next year (presumably they're on annual cycles) should see an enormous drop. It will be interesting to see.
This is one of the more insightful bits of investigative journalism I've read in a long time:
[...] one of the most compelling investigative projects
[Taxi] plate holders included an airline pilot, a dentist, investors who lived in Florida and Israel, and estates that had inherited the licenses after the holder died. The problems created by the plate system were mind-boggling. At least 30 per cent of the industryâ(TM)s revenues went to people who did nothing but milk income from their licenses.
So the Toronto Taxi system is a cesspool of entitled leeches, and Uber â" which nonetheless seems to have a shady side to it â" seems to be doing some overdue jostling. Hence the ridiculous class action.
I call bullshit.
What machine, exactly?
Just another anecdote:
I just whipped out my iPhone 1, and it is downright snappy compared to my iPhone 4s, and from a usability perspective in terms of "snappiness" comparable to my wife's iPhone 5s. Of course the iPhone 1 does a lot less than the newer models, but certainly appears to me that it did the core things just as fast (calling, messaging, etc).
Well, the US has divided its authority into houses to maintain a balance of powers, so that no single authority can dominate the decision making process.
The executive is charged with being the head of state, namely a single person to negotiate treaties. The senate, or the "upper"/"elder" house, must ratify those treaties before they become law.
The congress, the "lower" or "junior" house, was meant to deal with day-to-day issues of the younger folk, those with a future.
In general it was originally decided that any two of the congress, senate, and executive are needed to make a law.
The judicial branch is intended to resolve disputes based on judicial principles. Except where there is a legal vacuum they cannot create law ("stare decisis" / "ratio decidendi").
It would that the balance of the division of powers is mulching of late, and I agree it is a problem â" not just on principle, but in sticking with the design choices of the founders of the United States.
What socialism is going on?
You mean what socialized programs are in the states? The list is pretty long, inluding e.g.
- Public education
- Food assistance
- Road infrastructure
- Air traffic control
Of course there is also the socialization of losses on Wall Street, with the bailouts of the big banks by taxpayers.
Just some examples. Or have I misunderstood the question?
(or why I believe encrypting everything is a bad idea) is worth a read on this.
I am not sure I agree on every point, but it's well thought out post.
corps will include this in the TOS that everyone agrees to without reading
With the law in place, including it in the TOS would be superfluous.
in fact most of the information that survived through the dark ages survived because of monks
Much survived because of monks, but if my history is right (and it's probably not) the enlightenment came from knowledge that survived via the Arabs. Hence we have names like Algebra (from Al-Jabr), for example.
I am seem to recall that during the dark ages the Romans/Italians had around 2-5% literacy rate. Not much knowledge survived there.
There was progression by monks during the middle ages, notably time-keeping and eyeglasses. But I am not sure how much historical knowledge was retained by them. It might be lots - but I've just not seen any historical books to that effect (though I would enjoy reading knowing more).