Comment Re: I'm so glad the government makes me safe. (Score 1) 114
One sided contracts are perfectly fine and morally defensible.
No they aren't.
Just don't sign it if you think it is one sided. However - duress is something completely different: a contract signed at gunpoint is of course not valid.
You're either being a troll or the most naive person I've ever met.
Why do.you think people sign work contracts for $7.25? Sign non-competes after separation without compensation? Sign training payback contacts? One-sided notice agreements?
I mean... Nobody's holding a gun to their heads, is there?
Do they do it of the goodness of their hearts?
Spoiler: there's always some kind of power gradient involved. Even the obvious answer "because they're stupid" is a power gradient. And so is a gun, or any other duress situation.
It's a gradual development, and theres's imit to what we will accept as "within personal responsibility of the receiver" or will reject as "abuse of the giver".
basic human right of freedom of contract.
First of all, that's not one of the human rights. it's just a general principle of private law.
Second, neither law, nor principles of law/nor human rights even basic ones, are absolute. They all find their limitation somewhere, typically in other laws or human rights.
I can't believe I even need to explain this basic fact of civic knowledge to you; what are you, a 4th-grader?