... use the 1.85 million unemployed in Japan to pick the tomatoes. I doubt they're all wannabe rocket scientists or AI devs just waiting for their break.
Good point, but toiling in the fields is back-breaking work. What percentage of Japan's unemployed could physically work half a shift on a farm? In the USA, a huge portion of the unemployed are disabled. I don't think having 60 year olds or people with multiple sclerosis working the fields is a great idea. Also, you have to think long term...are the unemployed in Japan increasing or decreasing in age? Is their median age increasing or decreasing?...or more directly, even if you could find enough from the unemployed ranks to fill the need...money not withstanding, let's pretend the gov or a charity pays them to do the work so it is a viable working wage...how long would that last? 5 years? 10 years? 20? I think Japan is doing long-term thinking.
They're a notoriously racist culture. They'd rather build robots to do the work to pick their food and care for their elderly than import foreigners like the USA happily does. There are tons of nurses and workers in the Philippines as well as surrounding nations that could fill all their needs...but enough of Japan is hostile to the notion of foreigners that they'd not bother...why deal with intense racism in Japan when the USA will welcome you with far less hostility (even in today's current climate)?....and pay more too!
I've never lived in Japan, so I'll assume all I've read about and heard about from those who live there are a vocal minority. However, the fact remains that it's not an immigrant friendly place, for whatever reason...so yeah, you either have to fundamentally change your culture and ways of doing business and general life....or innovate your way out of future labor shortages. For Japan's sake, I hope they find a way to do both.
Seriously though, that sounds like a rough situation. I'm not looking forward to a job we have coming up where I'm going to have to wipe and re-adopt an in-place Unifi network that includes a nanobeam where the other end is hiding in a land of mystery.
Still, don't hold your rotten time on that job against Ubiquity. They make good stuff, and it's way cheaper than Meraki. No stupid license fees. You just got screwed.
Maybe we should turn this into an onsite IT nightmare thread. I bet we have some good stories here.
Also, in this case I'm not quibbling about which President is worse, I'm just trying to point out that you gave an example of something a President didn't have power to do and an example of something a President does have the power to do. You probably should have picked a different Trump example if you wanted two examples of Presidents being slapped down. Like how he can't send people checks without Congressional approval, though I haven't seen evidence that he is trying to do so. If he does try to do that without Congressional action, yeah. It's also possible the Court will strike his tariffs. We'll know in a few months.
I like your username.
That’s as far as she made it before Board of Education Chair Wesley McCall cut her off. He reminded her of “the rules that we talked about in the beginning” of the meeting concerning the board’s policy about “profane comments.”"
Yeah. Too vulgar to read out loud in front of the adults of the school board, but not too vulgar to give to children?
Besides, if you're talking about sexual orientation, you're talking about sex. That is not appropriate for kids who aren't old enough for sex-ed, which is questionable in and of itself.
https://www.propublica.org/art...
https://13wham.com/news/nation...
That doesn't seem like a good revenue stream.
Next item, $5.03 head scarf thing, free shipping.
Oh! But that first item I looked at was also an ad. So that's revenue.
The options to pay in installments (which I assume is what installment credit means) are both interest-free through Klarna or Alterpay, so where's the revenue there? Does Klarna pay them for the opportunity to not earn interest on a loan? I don't know how that works, never used it.
Anyhow, as I see it fraud requires the intent to deceive, not the potential for a deceptive outcome of other activities.
Oh, and here (I think this is where Bing sourced the summary) https://definitions.uslegal.co...
The last section seems to lean towards my interpretation - "To constitute fraud the misrepresentation or omission must be made knowingly and intentionally, not as a result of mistake or accident, or in negligent disregard of its truth or falsity."
And that's what it looks like when I write my response as I research it.
The only network hardware I have that I paid for is my U6 AP. Everything else is something a client threw out. I'm pretty cheap.
I came, I saw, I deleted all your files.