Forgot your password?

typodupeerror

Comment: Re:Don't forget— (Score 1) 739

by geekmux (#44019657) Attached to: Snowden Is Lying, Say House Intelligence Committee Leaders

Besides, that position is a mere puppet today. The President has no real power to do a damn thing. He's told what to do.

Oh yeah? Who is telling him what to do? The illuminati?

Ah, no. Something far more controlling over almost every aspect of our lives..

Corporations.

I wish it was merely ignorantly rich rappers posing as a secret clan. Alas, no illuminati...There is no need to dig for conspiracy when this Administration anyway. They wear plenty right on their sleeve, and wear it with an air of prideful arrogance.

Comment: Re:Prior art (Score 5, Insightful) 318

by geekmux (#44015109) Attached to: Ancient Roman Concrete Is About To Revolutionize Modern Architecture

Can this discovery of old stuff be patented today, or is the fact that the romans did it so long ago constitute prior art? Or will the argument go like "We don't have a treaty with the Roman Empire regarding Intelectual Property Rights, an nobody did this in our country yet, so sure, go ahead an patent it"...?

People are amazed by this new discovery and yet legality was the first thought here.

I know you were somewhat joking here, but this is exactly why we can't have nice things. Too many damn laws stand in the way of true innovation anymore. It will be our demise.

Comment: Re:Of course. (Score 1) 739

by geekmux (#44014877) Attached to: Snowden Is Lying, Say House Intelligence Committee Leaders

Your comparison of the US as worse than North Korea was a blatant attempt to abuse statistics to support your point through sensationalism rather than RATIONAL facts. Yes, you stated facts, but facts applied without reason aren't useful. You rely on sensationalism instead of making a strong argument for your case. Note, I agree with you that absent some strong evidence to why there is an actual large threat to national security (which has yet to be presented), there is no reason the collection of information should have been secret in the first place. That doesn't mean I need to make poor comparisons of America to Nazi Germany or North Korea. Neither is accurate (yet). We do need to be vigilant to make sure it doesn't go there, but when you make sensational claims, they only inflame people in whichever way they were already leaning and causes more of a problem rather than contributing towards a solution.

#1. By the numbers, you are right. Hope that makes you feel better.

#2. The numbers are irrelevant. The reasons we incarcerate people, especially when they should have been protected by half a dozen Amendments our Government ignores daily, is the real issue.

Hope that makes you feel better.

Comment: Re:Don't forget— (Score 1) 739

by geekmux (#44014815) Attached to: Snowden Is Lying, Say House Intelligence Committee Leaders

I've been thinking about this, and the problem is, there's no one competent who the country wants into power. Who would you have as president? Bill Gates? Warren Buffet? Tiger Woods? Angelina Jolie? There's not really anyone who would make a good president.

If you literally cannot find anyone fitting for a particular position of power, then perhaps it's time to stop looking for candidates and start asking why is that position so difficult to fill.

Besides, that position is a mere puppet today. The President has no real power to do a damn thing. He's told what to do. By those who put him there.

And now we start to see why...

Comment: Re:Don't forget— (Score 1) 739

by geekmux (#44014799) Attached to: Snowden Is Lying, Say House Intelligence Committee Leaders

Oh, can it. We don't get a real choice during elections.

Systems of power will perpetuate themselves until they fall.

Sure, if you believe history and the warmongering way of removing corruption.

I'd prefer the peaceful approach by simply making them irrelevant again, in much the same way our founders simply removed ourselves from the island of Great Britain a couple hundred years ago. Perhaps not completely peaceful, but the bottom line is British rule and law became irrelevant.

It's easy to remove power when it no longer matters. You simply ignore it. Our Government is well on it's way to creating this mentality. US citizens break dozens of laws every single day, and a lot of them knowingly (drinking and driving, speeding, illicit drug use, etc.), so we already have a casual approach to law adherence. Make them even more draconian, and you'll simply make the masses ignore you even more. Forced incarceration? Yes, that is likely a possible side effect, but again, our Government will quickly find out that when you've even put the brilliant people behind bars, your country quickly becomes rather fucked.

Of course the larger concern is whether or not "fucked" is actually an end goal at this point. At the rate we're going, sure seems that way.

Comment: Re:Sure... (Score 1) 739

by geekmux (#44008157) Attached to: Snowden Is Lying, Say House Intelligence Committee Leaders

Just in March, Clapper testified to congress that such a program didn't even exist. On March 12th:

[Wyden]"Does the NSA collect any type of data at all on millions or hundreds of millions of Americans?" [James Clapper]"No, sir." [Wyden]"It does not?" [Clapper:]"Not wittingly. There are cases where they could, inadvertently perhaps, collect -- but not wittingly."

There have been too many lies and half truths for me to believe anything that the NSA, Obama administration, or upper congressional committees have to say on the matter.

And yet the part you should be even more concerned about is reaching the point where they have the guts (read arrogance) to stand there and tell you the truth to your face, knowing there's not a damn thing you can do about it.

(and yes, they have already reached that point.)

Comment: Re:Don't forget— (Score 3, Insightful) 739

by geekmux (#44008075) Attached to: Snowden Is Lying, Say House Intelligence Committee Leaders

a pack of politicians with some of the historically lowest levels of public regard and trust in the history of their nation, though to be incompetent or crooks by 9 out of 10 individuals.

And yet they are repeatedly voted into office.

When trying to figure out who should wear the dunce cap, perhaps we should start with the ones putting crooks in positions of power.

Comment: Re:Of course. (Score 5, Insightful) 739

by geekmux (#44007977) Attached to: Snowden Is Lying, Say House Intelligence Committee Leaders

It says something (sad) about the state of our government when I'll take the word of a 29-year-old who ran to Hong Kong over that of the government.

Uh, given that many of the most powerful positions within our government are still elected positions, I'd say you're only half right.

It says a hell of a lot more about the apathy and ignorance of the voters who helped create it.

And yes, of course it's too late to effect real change. This didn't happen overnight, didn't start with some guy named "Bush", and won't end with some guy named "Obama". That said, it seems that finger pointing creates headlines and generates click revenue these days, so back to our regular two-party mudslinging system we go, ironically in the name of capitalism.

Comment: Rather odd secret to keep. (Score 1) 139

"The company, Devon Energy, isn't talking about its data center or even confirming that it has one capable of handling these winds...."

I'm all for keeping things confidential to avoid disclosing vulnerabilities due to more traditional attacks, but this barely makes any sense whatsoever.

Why would you not want to advertise you have a data center with these capabilities, smack in the middle of tornado alley...

Comment: Re:depends on what you're going into (Score 4, Insightful) 656

by geekmux (#43874661) Attached to: Ask Slashdot: How Important Is Advanced Math In a CS Degree?

if you're going into app development or IT, probably not much math needed. i've been in app dev for a long time (and quite successful). Those times that i actually need math? I just look it up, program it, then forget it. I never have needed much math. However, if you're going into some CS field that requires math, well, obviously, it's worth your while to study it.

I think that was the point of the query here, exactly what fields remain today that require the level of math that is (rather arcanely) still infused within a CS degree?

I fell into this same trap when initially pursuing my degree. Avoiding all the advance math requirements due to my own hatred of it, I was facing three separate tracks of nothing but I/II/III math courses, which were obviously best taken in succession. It was going to take me way too long to accomplish this (while going stir-crazy on nothing but math), so I ended up switching to the MIS path, which didn't have the absurd math requirement.

Comment: Re:scanning students for bus? (Score 3, Insightful) 342

by geekmux (#43872897) Attached to: Schools Scanned Students' Irises Without Permission

mag stripes on student IDs.

You're underestimating the extent to which the kids will subvert a system.

Yes, and I'm also failing to understand why any of this shit is truly necessary, since it would appear for the most part (99.9999999% statistically?), over the last 50+ years of busing students to/from school, this hasn't been a justified necessity until now, in an era where taxpayers can be bent over at will to pay for greased palm programs.

And we're stupid and apathetic enough to re-elect them.

Comment: Re:Just another way to destroy ourselves (Score 2) 351

by geekmux (#43870897) Attached to: India's ICBM Will Carry Multiple Nuclear Warheads

80% of the Indians don't have a toilet to shit in, but the government is more worried about expensive war toys with no purpose at all.

Way to go, India. There's nothing like getting your priorities straight.

Plenty of homeless people in the US too, including Veterans of many wars.

Don't make it sound like any other country anywhere is justified in even stockpiling these damn things, let alone developing them to make them more "effective" at total annihilation.

Comment: Re:How to fix the drug enhancement issue (Score 1) 276

by geekmux (#43863235) Attached to: Pitcher-Turned-Law Student On Cheating In Baseball

Everyone gets tested after a game, any single person come sup positive, then game is considered a loss. Happens twice, they give up 25% of merchandising for a year.

Make it an incentive for the owners to fix it, and the owners will fix it.

End result: Every single team purposely throws a "cheater" into the drug testing mix, resulting in losses for every single team. Happens twice, and the entire franchise is dinged 25% on merchandising, causing the merchandisers to be punished, creating a 30% markup to account for losses. Fans are the ones ultimately punished.

C'mon man, you gotta do better than that. I promise you that is what would happen when billions are at stake. They would band together quicker than oil companies fixing gas prices just to break that system in half and go back to the "good ol' days".

Comment: Re:Safety consideration (Score 1) 133

by geekmux (#43858569) Attached to: Space Diving: Iron Man Meets Star Trek Suit In Development

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Felix_Baumgartner

I'm pretty sure that if anyone could have done this with added rockets, wingsuits and head-mounted lasers it would have been Red Bull & Felix.

And I'm also pretty sure that the concept of oneupmanship still exists (says the design engineer who thinks parachutes are "boring")

Also, Felix's goal was not to soar like a bird in a wingsuit. He was going for several world records that had more to do with height and free-fall that had been set decades earlier, by the very man who mentored him for this challenge.

Comment: Re:Safety consideration (Score 1) 133

by geekmux (#43858553) Attached to: Space Diving: Iron Man Meets Star Trek Suit In Development

A company that can provide two layers of life-saving security and yet only manufactures one should be charged with manslaughter, but instead we're allowing it because it caters to thrillseekers? Where was this kind of logic during the anti-smoking campaigns of yesteryear? "Smoking is okay; it's a thrill-seeking behavior!" Yeah.... okay, sure.

So, should we charge hand chalk companies with manslaughter because some thrillseeker decides to free climb a mountain in Yosemite park instead of also purchasing and using at least 2 ropes, 4 carabiners, and 17 points of connection on the mountain face?

Do you step on a commercial airline with a parachute strapped to your back? Should we sue the airlines for not providing one?

It's also odd that you would question the backup safety system while many would question the concept of jumping from space in the first place, which most would consider "insane" regardless of the safety system(s) involved.

1 Mole = 007 Secret Agents

Working...