Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:I'm not sure I would call it happy (Score 2) 148

I think the tech just came along a little bit too early and people got too excited.

True. We kind of needed an intermediate medium. We went from approx 1MB floppies to hundreds of MB on a CD. Nobody had any idea how to fill all that space. But floppies were really suffering from being too small. The likes of Wing Commander and The Secret Of Monkey Island 2 each took around a dozen disks.

Comment Seems really wird behaviour from the seller (Score 1) 89

If I was selling anything of any reasonable value, I'd want to make sure there was a clear and definite agreement precisely to prevent this sort of lawsuit from happening.

I'd have responded with "I need more than a thumbs up. Can you send an email confirming that you agree to the terms", or at least asked for a text providing clear unambiguous confirmation.

Comment Re:Stop forcing channel bundling? (Score 2) 104

Streaming absolutely bundles. You just buy each bundle from a different provider.

A la carte wouldn't make things cheaper. There's typically one channel that people are willing to get the bundle for, and the others are added as a value add. The cable company pays more for certain channels, and you're paying for the one you want in a bundle.

Comment Re:dude (Score 2, Interesting) 352

Globalization honey! Elon has plants in Germany, China, is opening possibly in South America, is opening a plant in Mexico. He also has cornered the satellite broadband market (worldwide, as seen in Ukraine), and many other core industries. Now owns the post powerful media asset in the world (X) which is becoming a new "Facetime" too, and a vast trove of content for the AI era, for which he has now founded his new kind of "OpenAI 2.0", then top with Human-Machine interfaces/cyborg tech (NeuraLink), and the absolute dominance in Space exploration, that the idea that this is "Elon's Empire and his good luck" is risible. GM and Ford, for example, are having more trouble with transitioning given they extremely stupid commercial models, unions, their extremely stupid enormous part suppliers, and other internal issues (like Ford funding one of the wokest of the wokest idiotic NGOs) just shows them, and GM (who receive immense subsidies after the 2009 crisis) means it may well prove that they may never be competitive, subsidy or not.

Comment Re:Obviously not (Score 1) 157

My LLM thinks you suffer from datafixation, but since I couldn't find the word I it for a definition, see below.

Datafixation (noun):
        - The erroneous belief or assertion that artificial intelligence or other data-driven systems are strictly bound or limited by the data they have been provided with, negating the potential for novel outputs, creativity, or the generation of unforeseen solutions through complex processing, pattern recognition, or other computational mechanisms.
        - A cognitive bias where individuals underestimate or dismiss the capability of machine learning systems to extrapolate, innovate, or exhibit emergent behaviors beyond the scope of their training data.

Usage:
The claim that a machine learning model can never surpass the creativity of its training data is a clear example of datafixation, overlooking the numerous instances where AI has generated novel, valuable insights or solutions.

Slashdot Top Deals

All Finagle Laws may be bypassed by learning the simple art of doing without thinking.

Working...