You seem to me to be saying things about God that my experiences, and my logic, very strongly contradict. It may be that you're compelled to believe that crap for some reason beyond my understanding, but nobody else has to take it seriously.
Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!
We've improved Slashdot's video section; now you can view our video interviews, product close-ups and site visits with all the usual Slashdot options to comment, share, etc. No more walled garden! It's a work in progress -- we hope you'll check it out (Learn more about the recent updates).
A warrant is a document authorizing certain specific actions on certain specific people. It says nothing about making back doors available in general. There is no legal requirement to add a back door (except for communication systems, with CALEA). It is possible that the government is somehow pressuring companies into providing back doors, but there is no legal way to do that in secret, and I'd like to have some evidence before I believe it's happening. I'm not that paranoid.
Except that it isn't Twitter refusing to grant itself such access. It's Twitter Ireland refusing to grant Twitter USA such access. The court can order Twitter USA to do whatever, but Twitter Ireland has to act, and they won't. It wouldn't be a comfortable position for Twitter USA, but if they can't get the information and have a perfectly good reason they can't get the information.
How sure are you that the place was properly posted? I'm very definitely not sure, having had some experience with that and having friends have some experience. Private towing of that sort is a racket.
For this discussion, I don't care about people breaking the law. That's something different.
How obvious was it that she was going to get towed when she parked there? I am really getting to hate the idea that, since her car was towed, she was legitimate prey, and responsible for every possible humiliation that followed. There's no guarantee that the towing was even legal.
After that, you seem to be saying that she had to do something, probably embarrassing, that she had no expectation of privacy for, since it was on somebody else's private property. Are you normally the "let the companies screw the people" type, or do you make an exception for scum-suckers like towing companies?
Math depends on logic. Without some sort of Universe, we wouldn't have anything that can do logic. That's the limit of the dependence, since math has nothing to do with the nature of the Universe.
If life is priceless, then each moment must be priceless, and so if I'm left in a bad position because somebody steals my car I'm wasting priceless moments of life, and so car theft is as bad as murder? You can't make a society function on the principle that life is priceless. It has to be very highly rated, but not infinitely.
Relatively how likely is that? If you've been wrongly convicted of first-degree murder, are you better off with a death sentence or with a life imprisonment sentence, since people are going to work harder to get you exonerated if you're on death row?
I'd think that due legal process is a valid excuse, so by that criterion execution isn't murder. It may not be ethical, but that isn't the issue here. Murder is not defined as unethical killing of another.
If there is no due process, and there's not always due process in these cases, then I'll go along with murder. (One prisoner wanted to save a piece of pecan pie for after the execution; despite the state law against executing someone who can't understand what execution is, they fried him anyway.)
It costs more than life in prison because of the necessary appeals and legal safeguards against putting an innocent person to death (not that that works nearly as well as it should). Does this mean that an innocent sentenced to life imprisonment is much more likely to serve the entire sentence than a person sentenced to death?
Mathematically, a complex number is just another kind of number, easily understandable.
Practically, you don't actually understand the real numbers. Heck, you don't really understand sufficiently large integers.
Depends on your definition of "random", I guess. Under certain circumstances, it's unpredictable without calculating it, but it can be calculated.
Math doesn't depend on the Universe. It happens that some mathematical constructs are extremely useful in modeling the Universe, and over the centuries we've tended to concentrate on the more practically useful varieties of math. There's nothing magical about it. Math isn't physics and physics isn't math, but they get very intertwined sometimes.
You do realize that energy is a completely human-created concept, don't you? In Nature, you see all sorts of things like kinetic energy, gravitational potential energy, chemical energy, heat energy, and so on, and humans eventually learned that they could make up a concept that tied all of those things together which even had a conservation law.
Pretty simple when you ignore even basic things like frequency and phase.