Right now I do not have a well formed goal in mind. My initial goal was to relieve the sciatic nerve pain. Then it was to learn kung fu. I have pretty much plateaued and am trying to get over the hump, but lack the motivation or goal to do so. Right now I am on auto-pilot, just training seven to eight hours a week and working to refine the techniques and skills that I have. Teaching a few classes a week helps too because I enjoy helping others, but I am definitely stuck in a rut with my own training.
Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!
We've improved Slashdot's video section; now you can view our video interviews, product close-ups and site visits with all the usual Slashdot options to comment, share, etc. No more walled garden! It's a work in progress -- we hope you'll check it out (Learn more about the recent updates).
Mine still flairs up from time to time, but only when I slack off and stop exercising. It is definitely manageable.
I tried the whole "rest and pain killers" routine and that just made it worse. I am fully convinced that the only way to deal with sciatic nerve pain is with exercise / stretching.
This is spot on and should be modded up.
Enter personal anecdote...
About fifteen years ago I was starting to struggle with sciatic nerve pain due to years spent driving a car with a heavy racing clutch in traffic, and a lack of exercise. I considered my options and decided to start practicing tai chi. I caught a bit of a break and found a legitimate sifu. After a couple years of tai chi, I started training kung fu as well. It has been over a decade and I train on a daily basis. I can eat whatever I want because I burn it off.
None the less, it is a struggle. Despite all of the benefits, there are plenty of days when I would rather go home after work and play video games instead of heading over to the temple to train or teach classes. I still have not overcome the "exercise sucks" mentality. Sure, the endorphins are great and being able to defend myself is great, and have a strong and healthy body is great... but it is still work for me, not fun.
Which certainly doesn't claim 5000+ researchers per capita. The highest possible number of anything per capita you can have is 1 (one). Sweden has 5000+ researchers per 1 million capita (to put it like that).
One central requirement is that the person punished can learn something from it
and experience it. Since the end of your life is the end of experience, the "punished" doesn't experience the punishment.
Capital Punishment is vengeance, no more, no less. A civilized society doesn't do vengeance. A civilized society is governed by logic and reason. Sadly that hasn't been the case anywhere in the US since at least the late 1970s, and since the 1990s it's been all about Jesus, God, Santa Claus, The Tooth Fairy and other childhood fantasy figures.
And none of that has to do with the facts that some people do deserve it
Lots of people deserve to die. Capital "punishment" is not punishment however, given the fact that the "punished" just stops existing and is therefore no longer neither punished nor capital. This is why the base difference between a civilized society and a non-civilized society is whether the government engages in acts of vengeance (capital punishment). No civilized society engages in vengeance. It's for the mentally deficient.
The USA though stands shoulder to shoulder with Nigeria, Saudi Arabia and The ISIS in supporting capital punishment.
Execution is vengeance, not punishment. A civilized society doesn't engage in vengeance. Simple as that. The US in this regard is about as civilized as Saudi Arabia and The ISIS.
The question was specifically how to deal with people who only offer criticism and do not contribute anything themselves.
Criticism is a part of development or any creative effort. Development is an iterative process and requires feedback and input from lots of people.
However the person who should leave the team is the person who does not have anything to offer. If someone's only "contribution" is to suggest how other people "should" be doing the work, that person is not really contributing.
There is an old Chinese saying that is tangentially related here. "The person who says it cannot be done should not bother the person who is doing it." Similarly, the person who says it should be done another way should either demonstrate that by doing it themselves, or STFU and leave the team alone.
Open Source is developed by and large by volunteers. While critical individuals are able to offer their criticisms, the people are doing the actual work are equally able to ignore them. Either a person is contributing code, contributing to the effort through things like documentation, wiki support, what ever... or a person is just a hanger on leeching off of the efforts of others. If that person is the worst kind of hanger on; the topping from the bottom, back seat driving, wanting to be in control but lacking the talent to do things themselves type of hanger on... well then fuck them.
If a person is living an area of the world that lacks the bandwidth to view online videos, are they really the kind of person who will be accessing content about how to build and deploy multi-tier applications into a IaaS stack?
Thank you for the laugh.
While this might not be the most subtle way of handling things, it could be quite effective to repeat the same question every time they are critical. "What have you contributed?"
Just ignore their arguments and ask them what they have contributed. Over and over and over again.
They will either go away, stop posting so much, contribute, or perhaps realize that the whole point of the movement is to contribute actual code and functionality.
On the Internet, ignore them. In real life, talk about them every time they open their mouth and complain. "Oh there goes Joe again, whining and NOT CONTRIBUTING." Then return to your regularly scheduled activities of doing things.
How do you deal with things like re-tests and conflicting priorities for remediation? For example, client wants vulnerabilities patched in one week but the next maintenance window is for two weeks.