Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment I'm a trifle surprised (Score 1) 30

I'm not surprised that Valve is dropping 32-bit support; the 'gaming on 32-bit windows' market cannot be all that large or all that lucrative; what does surprise me a little bit is that the announced end of support doesn't line up with anything I immediately recognize. End of 2025/beginning of 2026 actually puts them considerably later than most stuff using chromium for UI rendering(not sure if they've been doing a bunch of backporting or if they consider the fact that they are mostly rendering their own content a security control); but doesn't line up with the deprecation of any other 32-bit dependency I recognize offhand.

Anyone have a plausible speculation on whether there is something else getting deprecated that likely drove the decision; or if it's just a matter of having to pick a nice round number to pull the plug on something that could be continued but isn't really worth the hassle?

Comment Re:$599? (Score 1) 113

They can barely make a phone at that price point.

I agree Apple's phones are overly expensive, but - there is a cost associated with miniaturization and having to engineer for smaller space. Making a $599 laptop should be easier than a $599 phone with equivalent computing power.

It's of the reasons why thin, light laptops cost more than thick, heavy laptops - especially back when they first went mainstream.

Comment Don't really care either way... however (Score 1) 40

If it happens, it at least isn't an actively bad idea like the touch bar was.

I unfortunately have a (last-gen Intel) MacBook Pro with a touch bar. Even after several years, I am constantly accidentally triggering things I don't want... it's just too easy to graze the touchbar when you're hitting a number key. And before you say "just map it to function keys" - all that will accomplish is to change what I'm accidentally triggering.

Comment Re:apple profits from scams (Score 1) 40

Apple isn't responding to requests to remove it though it's clearly fraudulent (it's even using a version of the same name) which can only be because they get a cut of the fees.

I can think of other possible explanations.

- If they are unfamiliar with your application, it's not trivial for them to definitively determine that yours is the real one.
- The app store is huge and they don't adequately staff the group responsible for investigating these sorts of claims.
- Some combination of the above explanations (including yours).

Slashdot Top Deals

Practical people would be more practical if they would take a little more time for dreaming. -- J. P. McEvoy

Working...