Comment Re: Oh, Zuck... (Score 1) 78
Yes. I backed the DK1 on Kickstarter and own a Rift. Doesnâ(TM)t change my opinion.
Yes. I backed the DK1 on Kickstarter and own a Rift. Doesnâ(TM)t change my opinion.
So they took what Carmack said and did the opposite. Instead of light and cheap, they went for the Cadillac. Sounds more like Zuck wanted a fancy toy and insisted on his way. I don't doubt there's a place for the Quest Pro in the marketplace - maybe even an important one for specific use cases - but I get Carmack's frustration.
I mean if nothing else, I guess the Quest Pro is still cheaper than the HoloLens, but MSFT is getting that government money for defense and other industrial uses. Meta is trying to do VR second life as the primary focus, with, "it also games" (while most consumers mostly just want the entertainment side.. I don't think there's a lot of native demand to loiter in VR environments...
Usually FTTH is run over GPON. The most common standard is still 2.5G down / 1.25G up shareable by up to 32 nodes. There is also 10G GPON, 10G down, 2.5G up, but I have no idea how common it is. My local FTTH carrier is on a 2.5/1.25 system selling symmetric 1G service. Still plenty fast for residential, but definitely a shared medium. Have to control costs somehow. Residential customers don't want to pay traditional metro-e costs.
So what will you do less than a year from now?
Thanks for this response. I'm familiar with exchange-traded options but not employer-granted options. And, as I never exercise options, I hadn't fully considered strategies involving exercising them. Appreciate it.
Technically, you don't *need* $400K to exercise the stock options. You can do an immediate exercise -> sell and just take the profits of the difference between the strike price and current price of the instrument. However, doing that means instant capital gains tax hit, and also if you think the stock will continue to do alright and/or you want to collect dividends, you've lost the opportunity to hold the stock - which *would* require the $400K outlay.
Pretty slick.
Link to Original Source
I feel you're being a bit pedantic here. As you said, we're not talking about the general public - the audience is Slashdot. Vivaldi and Microsoft are both tech companies. However, they are dramatically different in size, age, and valuation. Further, Firefox is 14+ years old and has almost 7%[1] of the browser market - and that's a number that's dropping. Vivaldi is in the 2% "other" category and isn't even mentioned by name in my source. Wikipedia is 16 years old. Wikipedia appears in tons of internet searches. Similarly, if you search web browser, you'll probably see Chrome and Firefox listed. Chances are, you won't see Vivaldi except for perhaps a mention of the latest news.
My post about MSFT's $500bn valuation was a terse dismissal of a strange response during a brief break during my workday - not a fully formed argument.
Koch Industries I would have guessed was in the top 5-10. I am surprised they're not a lot larger than that. I know who they are and what they do. I suspect a goodly number of slashdot regulars would recognize their name and probably know they're involved in energy. Cargill probably not. I didn't think of them, nor know their business. Maybe not shadowy enough to catch popular interest? =)
Anyway, while it's interesting trivia, I'm not sure the relevance or your point if you were making one relevant to the thread. Microsoft is an old public company. Koch / Cargill are old private companies. Vivaldi is a 2 year old private company with 35 employees. I think it is fair that articles provide this background and refute GP's snark that it's akin to asking them to provide background on Microsoft.
Microsoft is a ~$500bn company. I think it's fair to assume most people know of them...
"Help Mr. Wizard!" -- Tennessee Tuxedo