I receively bought an xtelink 4 e-reader and was able to flash the thing with custom firmware directly from the browser. This safer IMO that launching some random flash software which might decide to anything when it starts.

I could see this also being very useful for people wanting to flash embedded devices from cloud based software. But it could also be used to drive braille readers, point of sale terminals and anything else that works over serial.

... until one of these competitors drops dead, ends up in a coma, or suffers a psychotic break thanks to the garbage these organizers helped put in their bodies. The lawsuits will be spectacular especially if a competitor kills, injures or harms somebody who isn't covered by a waiver.

I'm referring specifically to people who listen to certain artists so relentlessly the platform thinks they're super fans. Just buy the frigging albums. Not only do they support the artists with royalties but they own the content and save themselves renting it.

... maybe they should buy the content instead of renting it from a shitty service like Spotify.

Which might be great for chicken farming - cutting out the whole chicken egg laying stuff for broilers and just having racks of cloned embryos. And doesn't that sound like a far more likely intention of this technology than this moa smokescreen?

If they had an embryo of a threatened species they could transplant it into a sterilized egg of a more common species where it also has a yolk. This announcement just sounds like funding bullshit and if there is any commercial application it would be more likely for factory farming chickens.

Whenever a company dangles the prospect of resurrecting an extinct species the red flag should be raised. It's more likely they're looking for funding and their chances, funding or not, of resurrecting anything are low. But throwing an endangered / extinct species into the press release guarantees press coverage. This isn't the first time Colossal Biosciences has done this. Their schtick boils down to "think of the Moa/Dodo/Direwolf and give us money, and we pinky promise that our research won't actually be used for more banal and sinister commercial bioengineering purposes". Sure thing.

A company will become strapped for cash, or some new CEO will take over, or the company is bought out. And suddenly the thing that was bought and paid for in perpetuity gets gimped, or relabeled "classic" & discontinued, or the company finds some other way to show "gratitude" to the people who kept them afloat by diminishing or cutting off service.

Basically I wouldn't trust any product to be lifetime unless the entirety of the software can be downloaded with its own license key and continues to work regardless of what happens to the company.

These are the Surface Pro models. The downmarket model is the Surface Go. As for the Neo, it's a tight package but there is absolutely nothing special about it's specs which are actually pretty terrible. It's designed as a browsing device - the sort of thing a Chromebook or Surface Go might also be thought of.

The Surface Pro can run Linux but it requires a custom kernel to deal with its multitouch screen, tablet mode, camera & keyboard and is going to be a pain to make function in the way the hardware was designed. Buy something else if running Linux is your intention.

Well that's kind of what they're meant to be doing with their ARM laptops. Unfortunately having something that doesn't run the vast bulk of Windows software except through emulation (and still breaks) seems kind of self-defeating.

I wonder if Sony is getting a bit scared of Valve. Maybe they're even seeing how well their games are selling on the PC and the fact they're selling well scares them even more than if they didn't.

But at the end of the day it's free money. Sell the game exclusive on the console for a year or two and when it's back catalogue port it over to the PC and sell it again.

If it was that incredible, Tesla would be handing out their raw data like candy so everyone could see how amazing their FSD systems were. Except they don't. They hide it from independent evaluation, they hide it from the NTSB, they hide it from the families they've killed. But trust us bro, it's soooooooo safe.

Did I say it had to be like GNOME? No I did not. I said most dists (i.e. mainstream dists) use GNOME. But usability is why they do. Admins maintaining dozens, hundreds of desktops do not want to waste time on bullshit support calls caused by traps and complexity in the desktop software which thinks it should shove every option under the sun in the face of users.

If KDE had proper human interface guidelines that didn't fit on a cereal packet and adopted a UX ethos & direction rather than a kitchen sink mentality then something might change. But it hasn't changed in decades so I won't be holding my breath. But if it were me dropping 1.5 million on the project that's where I'd be demanding the money be spent.

And by "literally everyone", the usage of KDE is lower than GNOME because it is not the default in any mainstream dist with the exception of openSUSE. And if you're so into KDE you should be begging for the UX to improved instead of trying to pretend the way it is now is a virtue. It sucks. It sucks even compared to Windows. Because the KDE devs play the notes without understanding the tune. This has always been the case and makes for a complex desktop that generates support calls for admins who have better things to do.

I would say that maybe if the devs followed the KDE human interface guidelines they might improve, but the KDE human interface guidelines are practically non-existent, about 7 pages that read like somebody's weekend assignment. Spend the millions writing some proper ones, and adopting it. It doesn't require KDE become GNOME, but GNOME has at least made the effort and despite your dislike, it is an slick, unsurprising, simple, forgiving and discoverable desktop.