I don't want to spread bad information about the free Win 10 installation but some posts that I've read say that once you convert from Win 7 to 10, you get a new key and your original Win 7 license is invalidated. That is, once you convert to Win 10, if you don't like it you can't reinstall Win 7. Is this true? I hope not.
I was in my 20's and living in Boston in the 1970's where a few UHF broadcast stations were transmitting on-air scrambled pron. They scrambled the signal by reducing the amplitude of the horizontal sync signal. I built a circuit using a 4046 CMOS phase locked loop that re-injected the missing sync signal at the proper time. Lots of trouble for some early mild videos. Sad material compared to today. Little did I realize how much technology would advance in this important area in subsequent years.
If programming is like math (and I think it is in some ways) then the distribution of talent may very well be U shaped. There seems to be a few extremely talented mathematicians like Gauss, Euler, Cantor, Godel, Ramanujan, etc. and then everyone else. That doesn't mean that those like me near the bottom of the U can't appreciate and follow what those at the top accomplish but I think the nervous systems of those who can think so clearly about math are wired in a different way. Maybe so with programmers too.
Sounds like you don't do anything serious with a computer.
I bought a new machine with Win 8.1 (ugh) on it from Dell last week with plans to put OEM Win 7 on it. Dell said I could do that if I was willing to give up support and that was ok with me. To my surprise, when the machine arrived it had no license key sticker on it at all so I couldn't use a general OEM install program like the ones from Digital River. Luckily I had a Dell OEM Win 7 install disc from another machine and that installed and activated ok using the key stored in the bios. Is this a new trend that machines now come without a key sticker? Should I call Dell and insist on a Microsoft key?
I guess I'm a dinosaur but I finally moved from xp to win 7 recently. One thing about win 7 explorer usability that bothers me a lot is that there is no way to turn off automatic icon/filename sorting except on the desktop. When I change the names of files in a folder, each one jumps to a new position and it's difficult to tell which names I have changed. Even on the desktop there are problems. Try copying icons into a folder or a shortcut to a folder and the positions of the original icons change. Who at Microsoft thought this was a good idea? Does win 10 do the same thing?
This is a good response to your question. Too many of the other responses show that Asperger's Syndrome isn't uncommon among technical people (I'm not sure I can exclude myself).
I want to tell you that you have already given your daughter something that is very important. You say that she has an inquisitive mind and an interest in science and that is likely due to your example as someone with those qualities as well. She will have a happy life with that outlook. The world is such an interesting place if you take time to look and think carefully about it.
Yes, like many, my result was "Unique". I noticed that one item being measured was browser resolution. Since I was running my browser at less than full screen and the exact window size is a low entropy parameter, I decided to try again after maximizing my browser window. As expected, the result was a lower uniqueness score. That led me to wonder if some technique like modifying the exact size of the browser window by a few pixels each time it's refreshed might help somewhat to hide from these evil trackers. Perhaps modifying other parameters like which extensions are enabled or what fonts are installed on each refresh might confuse them even more.
Playing with a slide rule is like saying after sex, "I haven't had this much fun since I first encountered logarithms." In my case, I'd have to sadly admit that I've had more fun quantity wise with logarithms. Seriously, though, I too was in school at the time of the slide rule's demise. They were interesting to use. I recall using electronic analog computers at about the same time. They consisted of a patch board and a number of op amp differentiators, integrators, and gain blocks. You could use the patch cords to model a differential equation with the op amps and then apply power to get an answer as a voltage output. Are things like that still used?
Actually, I've read that Einstein probably wasn't aware of the Michelson-Morley experiment. His reason for rejecting the existence of the ether was based on a thought experiment as mentioned in many non-technical books on relativity. However, nearly all of these books fail to mention what the thought experiment was. I finally found one explanation of it in the book "The Big Bang" by Simon Singh. According to him, Einstein's thought experiment is such:
Get into a vehicle traveling at constant velocity through the ether at the speed of light c and hold a mirror in front of you face. You will see no reflection because both your face and the mirror are traveling through the ether at c and no light leaving your face can reach the mirror. But that would violate the fact that, as long as you are traveling at constant velocity in a straight line, no experiment can determine how fast you are going. Therefore, the ether doesn't exist.
Does my paraphrasing of the explanation ring true or am I missing something?
Yes, taxes on unspent income should be higher, not lower as now, on income other than that from labor. As often said, one man's income is another man's spending. Hence, the spending of everyone must equal the income of everyone. For some people to spend less than they earn, others must spend more than they earn. The government and financial industry actively encourage those who spend more than they earn go into debt allowing those with high incomes to drain money from the system and hoard it.
Better, I think, to go back to the high marginal income tax rates with generous deductions for domestic spending that were in effect during the pre-Regan era. That method of taxation would give the one percenters incentive to spend their money rather than hoard it and would give a much needed boost to the economy. Right now the one percenters, having bought off Congress, have a low tax rate without spending and can park their unspent money anywhere, even offshore, effectively removing it from the economy and causing deflation.
I still can't get used to the 16 by 9 format. For a computer monitor, it's much easier to scroll vertically than horizontally. For a TV, I get the feeling that I'm looking through a slot rather than through a window.
Actually for reading books knowing where you are does help line up the story. (beginning middle or end)
I think that's true. If so, maybe a small progress bar along the top of an e-reader continuously showing where you are in the book could be helpful. I don't know if any e-readers offer such a feature.
Car seats are built for long term comfort so the idea of using one at a computer has always interested me. Here's an article by a guy who actually built one:
It's not real pretty but I'll bet it's comfortable. Maybe someone can come up with a better looking design.