AI speech to text and text to speech would be a great addition for the accessibility subsystem. The current screen reader software voice sucks really, really bad. AI speech would be a great improvement. But that's the only place I can imagine where AI would be a benefit. Scratch that. If AI could do great handwriting recognition, that would also be a great boon.

Coffee has approximately the same natural flavor profile as the stuff that comes out of my dog's ass. As I tell my coffee-drinking wife: "Anything can be made to taste good with enough honey -- even dog shit and coffee." Coffee needs a honey or sugar to coffee ratio of about 1:3 to overcome the shit-taste inertia inherent to coffee.

This will be believable if they can do the same thing for Closed Source software. If they can't, then they are lying and infringing on copyright. If they can, then they will be the biggest software company in the history of software.

Because Islam WANTS everyone killed, including themselves. That is their entire objective. They think it will bring them, and only them, eternal sex. MAD does not apply to their idiology, because they really are insane.

Compilers and assemblers have been reasoning for nearly 80 years, by that definition.

You don't need a super-intelligence to do that. Just look at any church, synagogue, temple, or mosque. The general IQ of the targets already barely exceed room temperature.

Many ISPs will stupidly block port outgoing 25 and all incoming ports by default, so I have no doubt that they would stupidly block other traffic as well. ISPs are run by technologically ignorant people, so it is a mistake to believe they act logically.

Isn't it shocking how easy it is to provide a simple, highly effective tool that doesn't require doxxing yourself or your children? It could even go further by providing tools that allow parental control over the device. It's a very simple problem to solve, and become a fascist country is not required.

Parents have been the monitoring tool for ages. Nothing changes in the digital age.

That's always been a terrible comparison. Those places don't create an easily-replicatable copy of your ID that can easily be stolen and easily used for things like identity theft. They look at your ID, verify your age, and that's the end of it.

These online age verification laws are blatantly unconstitutional, horribly dangerous, and not thought out at all.

Copyrights generally last for the life of the author plus 70 years.

When we drive into the office, we are still working remotely. None of the servers I work with are even in the same building as my office. A few of them aren't even on the same side of town as my office. Fighting traffic to arrive at a building from which I work remotely is asinine at best, followed closely by horrendously stupid.

You can have Otisburg, but I want Marina Del Lex.

I can go either way. I don't put nearly as much emphasis on graphics as I do on whether the game is fun to play. I expect CGI realism in movies, but not in games. A $5 indie game with an interesting, fun, and unique hook is far more preferable to me than an irrationally expensive ($50+) AAA game with awesome graphics and shitty game play.

Some people are complaining that DLSS5 makes all the graphics look the same, but my complaint is that all the modern AAA games are all the same in game play. They all ran their course in the early 2000s, but they still get pumped out of the assembly line at a record pace. It seems to me that the focus on realistic graphics is because game studios have nothing new to offer.

Just today, I was on the Godot forums looking at a posting by someone looking for "dumb, silly ideas" for a new game. The community members threw out several off-beat ideas that sounded quirky, fun, and totally out of the box. I hope some of them get made, as they could be a welcome deviation from the cookie-cutter productions we see it most popular games.

That's the I.S./I.T. director and network manager where I work.