So blame greed for Steam retaining its dominance. Companies wanted the cake to themselves and failed to see the bigger picture that federation would have been a better idea. Develop a common platform that handles sign on, updates, achievements, anticheat, matchmaking, discussions, forums, reviews etc., but does NOT include a store. Companies would be free to sell their games however they liked from wherever they liked. The system could still have had a landing page or a promotional aspect but purchases happened elsewhere, possibly using SSO to make it simple and easy.
It would have been a more successful and fair system than what actually happened.
I certainly don't see the point of jumping from Windows 10 to Linux without considering that a lot of games aren't going to run any more. If you play predominantly through Steam then the pain isn't so bad because of Proton (WINE) emulation and some native builds. But anything outside of Steam, probably won't run at all, or only by screwing around with WINE or some variant, trying to circumvent DRM and the like.
Anyhow, the main driver for Linux gaming is obviously Steam Deck and Valve's efforts to make it as painless as possible for developers & gamers to run on it. As a side effect Steam also runs on desktop Linux and existing Linux users enjoy some gaming support.
I doubt many people using Windows 10 for gaming would see the attraction of switching to Linux when it would be easier to stay put, or switch to Windows 11 and continue to play every single title they own.
Government really need to get on top of this and require AI generated content to be watermarked and very clearly labelled on social media platforms.
They might claim safety but they have an obvious conflict of interest in being truthful. While I trust Waymo more for transparency that Tesla, the reality is all of these things should be held to regulatory scrutiny and independent research and there should be a statutory obligation to provide data that makes independent appraisal possible. And those appraisals should become published safety ratings for the service based on things such as 1) safety for occupants, pedestrians and other road users - not just road accidents, but robberies, attacks, 2) making progress, i.e not dawdling or driving erratically, 3) adherence to the law, 4) public services, i.e.
In addition, cities and governments should limit the fleet size of these services, tax them to fund public transport, compel non-discrimination of service, and amend road traffic laws to prosecute & criminally charge companies and board members if they are found negligent. And maybe, just maybe with all that in place then fatalities might be deemed acceptable, counterbalanced by the reputation and criminal liability these companies are under.
The best things in life are for a fee.