Comment Re: Too late. (Score 1) 48
Itâ(TM)s easier fat.
Itâ(TM)s easier fat.
Robots will bring back high paying jobs. With robots, more things can get done cheaper. Projects can be at larger scale and fancier.
Yeah let's just roll over and die?
Be understanding, he's trying to push the Overton window over to full on racism and fascist tribalism.
Why would someone go from Google to Apple nowadays? That's like jumping from the Carpathia to the Titanic.
Is the priority good code or emotional "don't use the competing product"? Remember, the Apple Macintosh SE was designed using a Cray supercomputer. The Cray supercomputer had been designed on an Apple Macintosh.
If you make slow bicycles, and need to win a bicycle race
(This is obviously not applicable and different than a team that is testing its own product.)
Of fake Linux on the desktop statistics.
It has a seat belt, yet somehow 40,000 people are allowed to DIE every year in a traffic accident. Did people sue car manufacturers during the 60+ years wherein cars didn't have them? They never faced lawsuits that could drive them to bankruptcy over it. You know they could have to pay a billion or something like that.
How many people has ChatGPT directed to off themselves? We allow cars to kill 40,000, but ChatGPT is liable if one person who had already decided to off himself uses it? This is the same as suing a car manufacturer for allowing someone to drive to a bridge location from which they jump off. And btw, ChatGPT does have some protection but ultimately if you're determined to find out information you'll find a way to make it give it to you. I mean it would have to block answers to questions like "what's the tallest structure in my town?" and other "dual use" questions
ChatGPT is an online service, if we held it to the standard that no person could utilize it to harm themselves or others it wouldn't be allowed to exist. The same as cars wouldn't exist if we decided that a car manufacturer is liable for every accident regardless of the user disregarding the terms of how they are supposed to use the car.
You don't use ChatGPT therefore you see no value in it. The rest of us do use it and want services like it to exist. You'd never ban cars, even though traffic accidents kill 40,000 people in the USA every year. If you care about protecting human life so much, how come you haven't banned vehicles?
Huh? Are you crazy? It obviously doesn't fly around with a 300 foot cable sticking out. Do you know how a tether works. Furthermore, if it does get tangled it snaps off and notifies.
Zipline's drone tech is a lot better and way quieter. The Zipline drone, which is already pretty quiet, stays over 300 feet above the drop site and reels the/ package down with a tether in an aerodynamic pod. No noisy drone landing and highly accurate package placement even when it's windy. Reference: https://www.zipline.com/techno...
AI implies intelligence of some sort.
There isnâ(TM)t enough data to train on for robotics. They are going to have to create it, using humans. They are going to have to show how to do all the things humans can. AI needs millions of hours of driving videos just to figure out how to drive. Meanwhile any human (ok almost) can learn to do it with a few hours of training.
How is a plumbing or electrician or roofing robot going to get the data it needs. It will need thousands of hours of videos of the various permutations and possibilities that it can encounter.
I can lose less faith in humanity by writing stuff off as AI.
To give the AI domain knowledge many humans will be needed. Think of every subfield in the world
AI is still pretty stupid. A human can be shown something once and he can apply that in many situations.
There are two ways to write error-free programs; only the third one works.