>Leave them there permanently but give them a way to access TikTok so that they can live cover from the scene to other disbelievers.
Like Stanley Kubrick did in 1969, but without TikTok. Authenticity for the win.
is the heart of a planet-destroying weapon system.
Other countries aren't putting US-registered SIM cards on their daily missile attacks.
Also unsure how "fastidious" can be used as a description of a virus.
TIL that the archaic definition of "fastidious," based on the original latin root, is "disgusting" or "disagreeable." Which, to be fair, is a label I would apply to a virus that causes something as horrible as Lupus.
Because Virgo sounded too much like Virgin Galactic and Cancer sounded exactly like "DO NOT WANT."
They are not returning Starships back to Earth and reusing them.....hell I have doubts they'll be able to land it in one piece at all.
The most recent test proved capability of doing this.
Elon is a tool and a con man, but I never understood the hate boner people have for SpaceX.
At least in some places, phone numbers have to be re-used after only a few months of non-use because of demand.
"Short, easy to remember" email addresses are also scarce, but you don't need a "short, easy to remember" email address to function in society. Most people do need a phone number.
I'm not feeling any sympathy for either Disney or Google on this one.
For the viewers caught in the middle, yes, but for the giga-corps, not so much.
The ads I get when I load up this submission's page and turn off my ad-blocker are, you guessed it, ads for AI products and services. Sigh.
Shocking how that finally got prioritized for the nation. And quick.
"Africa" is a continent, not a nation, and the very first sentence of the summary says this is "after more than a decade of planning."
The summary says merchant fees will reduce "by an average of 0.1% over several years" so I'd say the chances of this making anything cheaper at point of sale is on par with the sun going supernova in the next several minutes.
It's a hard, if not impossible problem to solve for 100% of people 100% of the time.
On the other hand, if society is willing to live with "you will probably have to show ID if you seem anywhere close to the age limit" then the problem becomes a lot easier.
If the age limit is 12 and you have a 4-digit Slashdot ID, it's pretty safe to say either you are over 12 or the ID wasn't yours when it was created.
Likewise, if your overall "user behavior" is has been consistent with that of someone well over 25 for several years, the odds of you being under 18 are pretty slim.
As a real-world analog, most stores where I live demand ID to buy age-18-restricted products if you LOOK under 30.
It will cost the government more to process the return.
If everyone did this and they made it clear to their representatives WHY they were doing it this way, it might "move the needle."
>barescent skor motion
Nice.
Chemistry professors never die, they just fail to react.
