Sorry, I took a shortcut with the definition.
The longer version is something most people can make at home with things most people already have in their kitchen.
This assumes sugar, butter, milk, fresh fruit, fresh vegetables, dried pasta, spices, cut or ground meat, etc. aren't processed enough to "count" as ultra-processed foods.
Most of your list could be "produced at home" by most people. Tea and Coffee are the largest problem on the list, but the only reason is geographic and not "processing" related. I'm pretty sure you know that, though, and are being purposefully obtuse for some reason.
>A $1,000 ticket better come with
I'd settle for the ticket coming with a signed album of their latest gold record, but only if the record was made of real gold and the gold content was worth at least $1000.
One very loose definition is that if it's something most people can make at home, it's probably not ultra-processed. If they can't, it probably is.
Not the hard-and-fast definition that most Slashdot readers are looking for, I'm afraid.
The Texas outbreak started before the change in administration.
That said, the decision to immunize or not immunize may have been made during the first administration of said idiots.
Personally, I blame this epidemic on over-amplification of a long-since-discredited paper in a major medical journal in the late 1990s.
As for the over-amplification: The idiots in charge aren't helping.
Has anything actually stored hashes in
You can also run your own server on someone else's server.
"Yo, dawg..."
Much as I agree with you from a moral standpoint, from a legal standpoint it is not as cut and dried as you make it out to be.
If you want to make the argument that "data about you" is "your data" that's fine, but the presumption here is that it's the airline's data, and it is offering it freely (as in speech, not as in beer) to the government. Where is the fourth amendment implication? It is not your "house, person, papers, or effects," it is the airline's and they're happy to let the government sort through it.
Tell the airlines that you are traveling overseas for a medical procedure... then privacy is covered by HIPAA.
Sigh. No it isn't. The airline is not a provider of medical services, it is not regulated by HIPAA.
While I agree that this is not something I want the government to be doing, what part of a database maintained by the airlines constitutes your person, house, papers, or effects? If the government demands access that would be one thing, but if the airlines say "hey, wanna buy our data?" and the government says "hell yeah" that is something else.
The median income in New York, San Francisco, and Los Angeles is higher than $83K. At least I hope it is.
>This is irritating AF even though I have the money in the bank because I get a percentage back.
The percentage you get back is a small part of what goes into the costs that the credit card industry charges consumers and merchants.
If no credit cards offered any kinds of rewards, the credit card companies could lower consumer and merchant fees and interest rates and still make the same amount of money.
Pretty much yes.
People buying essentials on credit has been around for a very long time.
It's never a place you want to be, but it beats starving or freezing to death.
panic: kernel trap (ignored)
