Good for her, if she exists and actually did that. With all the lies and bullshit you have been willingly spouting I'm not sure if I should believe this statement.

You want him out at any cost, without concern for the law or what it could do to your own cause in the end if you removed him by force rather than using the law. You have been abundantly clear on that.

Cowardice is a feeling. You cannot prove what someone feels.

It has been investigated and reported on more than once.

I have provided factual data to show that what Obama has actually done as president will result in him being remembered as the most conservative president to date. His actual actions have been demonstrably more conservative than Bush Jr., Bush Sr., Nixon, Ford, Hoover, and even St. Ronald the Redeemer. This is very well documented.

There is not a single bill that he has signed that Reagan, either Bush, or Nixon would have rejected. Not. One. Single. Bill.

Calling it socialism is requires a complete discard of reality. Of course, you don't know anything about socialism, so the discard is not quite as difficult from your starting point.

If he had vetoed it - even though it was a terrible bill that had nothing of what he wanted in it - he would have a legacy as someone who vetoed the only health care bill to reach the president's desk in decades.

jumped at the first excuse you could imagine to throw that label at me

Except that you have not been advocating a proper impeachment. You have shown that your disdain for President Lawnchair is far too deep to accept such a thing. For you, an impeachment would only be proper if it lead to him being permanently run out of Washington DC. Anything less and you would call for another one, until you get the result you want. At that point the impeachment is in no way proper.

From the standpoint of governance, what is at stake is our ability to use the rule of law as an instrument of human redemption.

I could offer reality instead but you would reject it.

I say that we already know competition is absolutely not the answer in terms of health insurance. it might be OK for car insurance, life insurance, hair insurance, or any of a variety of other forms of insurance, but it does not work for health insurance. Increasing competition between insurance companies will only increase the cost of delivering health care and make it more difficult for consumers to get the care they need. I have argued for decades that health insurance here needs to be a single payer system - just like in the rest of the developed world.

Being as we don't have a socialist emperor, there is no need to demonstrate any further.