cleaner nuclear power is solved problem, we already know how to make reactors that can burn "spent fuel" and leave waste that decays in decades rather than millenia. smarter countries are pursuing that, but the USA just extended life on its 2nd gen reactors that were designed in the late 1950s, can melt down if not externally cooled, and make waste that will last longer than any civilization has.

actually, those Hebrew writer in the Bible had more accurate calendar than we do, lunar calendar (e.g. Chinese, Jewish) trumps solar one

I was only addressing situation in USA.

but that fibre aren't yet available with iridium plating on the connectors for crisp bright treble

why do you hate them so much? A legitimate target for atomic bomb could have naval bases such as Yokosuka. but you prefer tens of thousands of incinerated civilians.

I must say these 800GB fiber bundles give very molten and sonorus bass notes below 64 hz.

wrong, bottom line is the tests have been "dumbed down" over the years, your closing gap of women's scores is due to that

and your parents are lightyears ahead of this fossils who have never used a PC

and let's hear about those foreign designers of the Rocketdyne F-1 engine, let's see if it matches my list of americans who managed, designed, built and refined the design of that engine

yes, you can add those things to list of about 30 other config changes and call the paper "How to Make Windows 8.x not so Much of a Pig"

Not an undertaking for your Aunt Minnie or Grandma

nope, making nuclear fuel from Ukraine's uranium was and is done by TVEL in Russia. The reactors are TVEL's also.

You keep saying that, but it is 100% valid to write C within Objective-C. The trouble is you'll wind up working with objective-c at the UI level. i.e. You'd be interacting with the user in Objective-C and doing model/class stuff in C/C++/Obj-C - whatever you choose.

Have you considered Objective-C for mobile development...

those minimal requirements are B.S., they'll get you a system that would bog down on typical youtube page. Hard disk with a windows office product and typical software will need 20+ GB to actually run.

from experience, minimal win 8 machine needs 4GB RAM, 60 GB disk

behind the bleeding edge? how do you explain OpenBSD having better and more wireless drivers than Linux in the late 00's?