In the US, child pornography is deemed to be legally obscene and exempt from first amendment protection. Oddly enough, the ACLU doesn't see it that way but the courts have been consistent in this interpretation.
Wasn't that program actually started under the Bush administration?
Well, yes but that's misleading.
So that Obama and Holder ended up taking all manner of shit from the Rabid Right--including a massive anti-Holder PR campaign by the NRA--for continuing to do what their guy had started?
This is the misleading part. The operation that became Fast and Furious began under the Bush administration as Wide Receiver but the program was vastly different under the Obama administration.
There was nearly seven times more guns allowed to walk during the Obama administration than under Bush. The Bush administration ended Wide Receiver in 2007 when they had issues with inadequate tracking. None of the Bush era guns have been used in homicides in the US. The Bush era program notified Mexican law enforcement of guns that they expected would cross the border, that didn't happen under Obama.
Whether you choose to chalk it up to incompetence or malice, there were many differences between Wide Receiver and Fast and Furious that show the Obama administration's operation was a wholly different beast.
[snip] Compromise was tried. [snip]
When? I don't remember that. What did the NRA compromise on?
You haven't been paying attention. The NRA supported the Lautenberg amendment.
It's not paranoia if he's right.
Also realize that porn with women with small boobs is prohibited in Australia.
Well come on now. What kind of sicko likes tiny titty porn?
Go big or Go home!
He was a good programmer so everyone mostly just tolerated it but his signature line was "I'm not a programmer, I'm an ENGINEER!"
I'm like, "ok fine. Go 'Engineer' up a fix to that VB code that -Other Coworker- fucked up, please."
The DNC isn't a charity; they exist to get people elected.
Not only that but to get people elected who will serve the best interests of the party. Some guy who wants to win to "make a statement" and claimed he will leave office in one year, a time frame in which he can't possibly achieve anything meaningful, isn't the guy to support.
The debates promote the entire party, and they're trying to create a contrast with the Republican clown show.
There are plenty of clowns on both sides.
Trump and Hillary may as well play Entrance of the Gladiators as their theme music when they make public appearances.
He's in favor of government funding for Planned Parenthood and he has expressed both support for gun control and complete ignorance of the current gun laws, so he's not going to pull away any Republican voters.
He has not put forth an agenda on Income inequality, the budget deficit/national debt, union support and police misconduct, so he's not going to be able to develop a connection with the Democrat base.
His one big issue is something that the majority of Americans do not support.
Bell Labs Unix -- Reach out and grep someone.