Don't count on help from the Supreme Court on this. Integrity Staffing Solutions, Inc. v. Busk, 574 U.S. 27 (2014), was a unanimous decision by the United States Supreme Court, ruling that time spent by workers waiting to undergo anti-employee theft security screenings is not "integral and indispensable" to their work, and thus not compensable under the Fair Labor Standards Act.
 
Jesse Busk was among several workers employed by the temp agency Integrity Staffing Solutions to work in Amazon.com's warehouse in Nevada to help package and fulfill orders. At the end of each day, they had to spend about 25 minutes waiting to undergo anti-theft security checks before leaving. Busk and his fellow workers sued their employer, claiming they were entitled to be paid for those 25 minutes under the Fair Labor Standards Act. They argued that the time waiting could have been reduced if more screeners were added, or shifts were staggered so workers did not have to wait for the checks at the same time. Furthermore, since the checks were made to prevent employee theft, they only benefited the employers and the customers, not the employees themselves.

Even if you just search for documentation or help with errors, aren't you going to get AI assistance whether you want it or not?

Good catch! Copilot didn't "share its work" and I mistakenly assumed it was a bar chart rather than a histogram with an unfortunate choice of bar width and x-axis range for this score distribution. For comparison, here's a Plotly histogram makeover of the Copilot-generated chart with a bin width of .1 and an x-axis that displays the full range of possible scores, which makes the outlying low scores readily apparent.

Copilot in Excel's October 2025 explanation of the IQR method it employs to suggest there are no outlier scores that a teacher needs to look at.