Comment: Re:Tied to conditions (Score 1) 789
How long have you been brain-dead?
-jcr
|
|
How long have you been brain-dead?
-jcr
rational planned economic system
BZZZZT!
A "planned economic system" is not rational, it is political. See the 20th century.
-jcr
The same claims were made at the beginning of the industrial revolution. The work we do will change, but there will always be work for people do to that machines aren't suited for.
-jcr
Personally, I like to hunt with a basket of loganberries.
-jcr
If you can run down a moose, you're in far better shape than I could ever hope to be.
-jcr
Bah!
If you're not barefoot and hunting with hand-lapped flint point on a spear, you're cheating.
-jcr
The DoJ's case alleges that the agency pricing model had a clause where the publisher wouldn't sell their books in other stores for less than they were charging in the iBookstore. If true, this is Collusion, and falls under anti-trust laws. http://definitions.uslegal.com/c/collusion/
No it's not. Almost every major retailer insists on the lowest price. Walmart does, Amazon does.
Such activities involve a pretty large number of people. It's interesting how they collectively can keep it a secret for a pretty long time.
It's even amazing that the "fixed" prices are not essentially different than Amazon or Alibris or BN. Very clever price fixing indeed.
BS they weren't 'different'. They were SIGNIFICANTLY higher. At least $3 to $5 higher under the 'agency' model, which on a book that was $9.99 is a 30 to 50% price hike.
Are you some Apple fanboi or something?
Your pulling monkeys out of your butt. Here's an actual price comparison:
http://paidcontent.org/2012/09/11/apple-is-already-fighting-amazon-in-the-ebook-price-wars/
Yes sometimes Amazon is cheaper. But mostly not. Sometimes apple is cheaper.
Amazon was operating under a normal wholesale/retail model. They bought from the publisher for some agreed-on price, and sold the books to the public for a price they set (which could be higher or lower than what they paid the publisher). Apple convinced the publishers to stop selling to Amazon and switch to an agency model. Under the agency model, the publisher set the price the public paid, and gave the retailers a cut of that. Apple also managed to write into the contracts that nobody could get less of a cut than Apple. That is price fixing.
No that is not price fixing. Walmart and Amazon and everyone else with clout signs contracts that say they must always be given the lowest price. And nearly all goods makers have contracts with sellers that fix the lowest price a good can be advertised at. (that's why you see those signs on web pages that say "add to cart to see price"-- cause they can't advertise it.
Such activities involve a pretty large number of people. It's interesting how they collectively can keep it a secret for a pretty long time.
It's even amazing that the "fixed" prices are not essentially different than Amazon or Alibris or BN. Very clever price fixing indeed.
I've been to LP meetings, I've talked about immigrations with plenty of other libertarians, and that's how I know you're lying through your teeth.
-jcr
The patent isn't on automatic generation of the caricatures, it's on their particular algorithm for doing so.
-jcr
Since its inception, the Libertarian Party has advocated open borders. Got any more lies you want to toss off?
-jcr
What you're describing is fascism, not progressivism.
ToMAYto, ToMAHto. "Progressives" are just another label for power-seekers.
-jcr
Old timer, n.: One who remembers when charity was a virtue and not an organization.