When people refer to Linux they normally refer to an operating system based on it, and the most common and well known operating system using Linux is one of a gazillion of Linux distros.
This article and the data behind it are talking about what is and is not based on the Linux kernel not what the general population defines as Linux. You want everyone to ignore that while making your argument.
No one has ever thought of Android as the "Linux", it's just bunkers. Why?
Strawman argument. Anyone who knows anything technical about Android knows it is based on the Linux kernel.
Because Google may replace the kernel component with something else and they almost went through with that for Android but stopped at certain Nest devices.
Classic whataboutism. You might as well speculated that a meteor will wipe out civilization and no one can update Android anymore. That is equally as relevant as your scenario. Android uses the Linux kernel today. It is considered based on Linux today.
My "ignorance" is OK, while your logic and understanding of this world have never been there in the first place.
Yes it is a lot of ignorance. As someone who is on slashdot, I assumed you would know better.
This isn't true. Transformer based language models can be trained for specialized tasks having nothing to do with chatbots.
That's what I just said.
They are not laying people off people revenue or sales are down.
The topic of this report is Amazon is laying off thousands of people. Did you not read the title?
The Linux kernel without userspace is 100% irrelevant and useless and the userspace defines it.
1) Linux is a kernel. Always has been. 2) The fact it is a kernel makes it more relevance because people can change the userspace. Linux can be used in a desktop OS, mobile OS, HPC OS, etc.
The average Linux distro userspace is a complete fucking mess, as Linus Torvalds himself reiterated [youtu.be] a few days ago.
A Linux distro is not the Linux kernel. To contort your argument, you are willing to bring in irrelevant facts.
I could care less about your car analogy. You got the premise wrong. You call everything with the kernel - Linux. That's not how logic, common sense and reality work.
No, let's be clear: You don't care about facts. Linux is a kernel. It has been for 30+ years since the very beginning of Linux. Today there are Linux-based OS variants which you have low opinions. But you are willing to mislead and obfuscate about what is Linux because you are unwilling to accept basic facts. An Acura is still a Honda despite your denialism.
Right, same here. But most Mac users aren't using the Unix nature of macOS in any way. I would guess that 95% or more never open a shell window ever.
It does not change the definition of Unix desktop if a user does not use command line. It is still Unix behind the UI. By that argument, HP Unix was not Unix because HP made many functions menu driven by default.
That said, the article was specifically talking about Linux desktops.
And you muddled the conversation by saying there were Unix desktops at your work. That is not true. If there are Macs, there are Unix desktops
Here's where the summary goes wrong:
Artificial intelligence is one type of technology that has begun to provide some of these necessary breakthroughs.
Artificial Intelligence is in fact many kinds of technologies. People conflate LLMs with the whole thing because its the first kind of AI that an average person with no technical knowledge could use after a fashion.
But nobody is going to design a new rocket engine in ChatGPT. They're going to use some other kind of AI that work on problems on processes that the average person can't even conceive of -- like design optimization where there are potentially hundreds of parameters to tweak. Some of the underlying technology may have similarities -- like "neural nets" , which are just collections of mathematical matrices that encoded likelihoods underneath, not realistic models of biological neural systems. It shouldn't be surprising that a collection of matrices containing parameters describing weighted relations between features should have a wide variety of applications. That's just math; it's just sexier to call it "AI".
"I got a question for ya. Ya got a minute?" -- two programmers passing in the hall