Your idea is that a NN which takes language as input, produces language as output... somehow has layers inbetween not related to language? Where do you come up with these ideas?

I stand corrected, this clearly shows that BYD cars are the best

If this is a topic you actually care about, there is a strong rec for this book, probably the best on the topic. You have the mental capacity to handle it.

Having "medicine security" is a good thing. You don't want all your medicine manufactured by a country that considers America an adversary.

It's a logical error to make an analogy, without also demonstrating that it applies to the situation. (Common mistake when people discuss legal things, which is why such conversations are often confusing).

No, I would not. I would care that you turn your brain on. If somehow you manage to do that, return to this comment, find the main point, and respond to that.

LOL Poe's Law applies to that comment. (In case you're serious, read some Karl Popper and help yourself. Or this one if you don't have the reading comprehension for Popper.)

How do you know? Do you have a citation for that?

Then why use the AI at all? Just present your own ideas.

Brevity is a gift.

"Using the outputs of LLMs to deliberately improve model quality" has nothing to do with model collapse. It reads like a PR release at best; at worst it's like LLM output.

K-Pop Demon hunters is another example of "algorithmic content" (as they define it).

It's a random mix of things people like, throw them together and hope people pay for it. See also: CoD and Fortnite. No one cares if Star Trek and Star Wars stay separate anymore. I want to see Harry Potter riding a Bantha.

If you defend yourself in court, it largely has to be public. That is what they are doing.

The intent of the measurement is most likely to obscure rather than inform. (Can't be sure because the article is paywalled. It's also possible that electricity is the most relevant metric when you are thinking about how much it costs.)

Especially when basically all methods of sabotaging cables(except possibly very near shore) are 'remote'/disposable; if only at the tech level of 'put anchor on rope because water deep'. Nobody is going to give a damn about losing an inert metal chunk.

Reportedly, none of that is public, the business of tapping a fiber line underwater is considerably more fiddly, and enough mines might make that a hassle; but it would also make install and repair far more expensive and probably just theatre when you consider the risk that someone at the telco isn't updating their ASAs.

I think the parent commenter was proposing an analogy to the various temples-overtaken-by-jungle and cathedrals-and-hovels societies; where the competing c-suites of the magnificent seven and aspirants suck our society dry to propitiate the promised machine god.

I have to say; datacenters will not make for terribly impressive ruins compared to historical theological white elephant projects. Truly, the future archeologists will say, this culture placed great value in cost engineered sheds for the shed god.