Forgot your password?

typodupeerror

Comment: Re:Teaching kids to think requires controversy (Score 1) 672

by Maritz (#39648305) Attached to: Tennessee "Teaching the Controversy" Bill Becomes Law

Right now, this issue is totally Balkanized and neither side is talking to the other. Opening it up to discussion might allow us to get farther than trying to pick on side or the other.

Creationists are not interested in listening, they are entirely ideologically motivated. They have no arguments of merit to make. Their arguments consist of logical fallacies and misconceptions. They're annoyed that science doesn't support the conclusions they were taught by their magical book, and will attack it through any underhanded, intellectually dishonest means available. Like passing bullshit laws such as this. They cynically target children because they know that when it comes to religion, it's all about the first thing to get to your ear.

Comment: Re:Well I say (Score 1) 1069

by Maritz (#39634939) Attached to: EA Defends Itself Against Thousands of Anti-Gay Letters
I would agree that the New Testament is a lot more sane and 'nice' as it were - but it makes me wonder why they don't throw away the old book altogether. Keeping the Old Testament and picking the few nice bits to be found strikes me as slightly disingenuous. I've been to Mass a few times over the last few years for funerals, weddings and such - the 'liberal' feel is very striking nowadays, with priests saying things like it doesn't matter what religion or denomination you are etc. - this seems to me to come more from some kind of modern social zeitgeist than from any part of the bible. That's just the impression I get. I'm pretty sure there's nothing in the New Testament that says homosexuality is OK (at least if there is I haven't seen it).

I had pancake makeup for brunch!

Working...