Comment Re: bUt NuClEaR bAd (Score 1) 90
What if building new safer nuclear allows us to decommission the older, more dangerous nuclear that is 'in the mix' earlier?
Great. Do that, on the same site only.
What if building new safer nuclear allows us to decommission the older, more dangerous nuclear that is 'in the mix' earlier?
Great. Do that, on the same site only.
If the Republicans don't want to be known as the "I love Hitler" party, they might need to take a stronger stance on large numbers of their members talking like that.
They don't plan to let us vote again*, so they don't care who they alienate.
* They could of course do scam elections like they do in Russia, to pacify dumbshits
It leads to lawsuits not to break monopoly, but to extract money. In some countries money is evil over a certain amount.
It doesn't matter where you are, hoarding while others do not have enough is evil, and hoarding cash (the wealthy currently have unprecedented cash reserves) exacerbates that. We need currency to circulate in order for the economy to function, so we print more money, and therefore the currency hoarders literally cause inflation. We keep hearing about the "job creators" but currency hoarders are job preventers.
With that said, none of that is relevant to whether the EU has the right to use lawsuits to break antitrust which is not monopoly-related. Insisting that only monopolies are relevant to laws which prevent anticompetitive actions in marketplaces is ignorant at best and therefore your focus on monopolies is likewise. But I don't believe you're that ignorant, which makes it seem more like malice.
Problem is though, if you look at all the major economies, the ones with the lowest CO2 per capita have nuclear in the mix.
Having nuclear in the mix is one thing, and "therefore we need to build more nuclear power" is something else. When we started building nuclear plants they arguably made sense, now building more definitely doesn't as we have cleaner alternatives.
Looks like it's a bit more complicated than the ac was letting on. But that has little to do with ARM so I'll leave it at that.
The cost savings will end when Arm jacks up licensing fees. Grsviton is gonna get hit too. ARM Ltd. is tired of watching their customers rake in all the revenue. And their Qualcomm lawsuit didn't work out. So Amazon, Google, MS, etc. are their next targets.
Which mainstream AI packages don't support Strix Halo?
Yeah, but not the old Delhi.
Ok bot.
No monopoly is required for them to violate the law.
That's true even in the US, not that we enforce antitrust law here.
And you've made your own non-anonymous coward comment. You're afraid to not be a cuck for corporations.
The Luddites didn't want to ban technology.
They wanted The People to share in the benefits, not just the capitalists (who have all the investment capital.)
You are still falling for and propagating anti-Luddite PR over a century old.
After that, there may be mass disease spreading in livestock which could severely affect our food supply.
You will eat nothing and like it.
Or, you know, starve.
Now do the calculations with a non-swasticar.
Tesla is worst at service of all US automakers, who wants to be chained to them?
A small percentage of Americans could barely get used to cab over vans
Driving a cab over is not hard. We got a diesel pusher bus where you're way further out in front of the front axle than that, and the only adjustment really is turning a little later. You get reasonably used to it in short order. If you don't have to deal with an 8' vehicle in a 10' wide lane (yeah they're meant to be 12' but then there's bridge crossings and such) then I bet it's not even scary.
The trouble with the rat-race is that even if you win, you're still a rat. -- Lily Tomlin