They don't define server, So xbox may or may not count. Arbitrarily.
The ToS for residential service forbids running of servers. He was violating the ToS. Sure, he got noticed because he was using a lot of data. But that isn't why they are terminating service.
It would be bad for business if his marks knew that they were suckers. Of course he would deny it.
That depends on if Mcaffee has a supply of bath salts.
remember to keep it under 3oz or you might not get through airport security.
As far as Impy is concerned...staying out of the kitchen?
Now sudo go and make him a sandwich...
So you're saying she was a Republican?
Backwards. The party with a vested interest in keeping people dependent on professionals who dole things out to them is the Democrats. That's the backbone of their entire constituency and the framework within which they describe everybody: needing a handout, or needing to be used to pay for handouts. Without playing middlemen to that one-way street, there would be almost not power in that camp. And so they seek to preserve it at every turn.
True. He turned out to by a crypto conservative plant, a false flag operative operating under the guise of hope and change. He is right of Ronald Reagan on a lot of issues, much to the absolute horror of the actual liberals in this country.
Prejudice implies I made the statement from a position of little or no prior knowledge. This is not the case. It isn't prejudice when it is based on their actual policies and actions. I am judging them with cause, and could justly condemn them much more harshly.
And does this mean that if my wife wants (or, more importantly, needs) to grab and use "my" gun that she'll also need gloves with my fingerprints on them, and I'll need a way to emulate her fingerprints?
This is all entirely nonsense. The bill is a stealth approach to making guns cost more, akin to those feckless plans to tax ammo at 1000% in order to attempt to change human behavior among psychopaths and dedicated criminals.
I am entirely for gun manufacturers making and offering such guns to those who want them if they think there's a market and they want to serve that market. Requiring such is complete BS.
This isn't exactly sensible gun control. A reliable gun is a necessity for gun safety. You give people the false impression of safety and the ignorant and foolish will take additional risks.
Sensible gun control involves things like universal background checks and mandatory firearm safety and local self defense law tests/training.
This is one of the most idiotic things I have read today, congratulations.
Its because everything else the conservatives believe in is so ridiculous, they just assume the right to bear arms is just has terrible. The right to bear arms is literally the only thing the conservatives get even remotely right.
Most self labeled liberals are not truly liberal in the classical sense, they are merely anti-conservative.
I say this as a radical progressive gun toting liberal socialist.
You stole my question, before I could even ask it.
So is it a case of where they start out following the ethics guidelines the classes taught them, but end up pushing the edge and pushing the edge until they go too far, with the process generally taking years, as they slowly become disillusioned and greedy?
You'd hope that they start out ethical. Judge Wright in California said that their porn trolling cases were basically allowed because they found the nexus of outdated copyright laws, a paralyzing social stigma for the defendant, and potentially expensive litigation that people want to avoid. It just seems like the lawyer's version of a get-rich-quick scheme. They can interject into class action suits and extract a payment that way with minimal effort, they can monitor bittorrent and send settlement letters to downloaders for a few thousand with minimal effort, etc.