Thanks, Pete. I lived in Geneva when this went down and it really really sucked. The post cards that came in the mail (I don't remember the Comcast ones, but the SBC ones were AWFUL - really? a guy eating a rat?) fed on people's worst fears. The kicker is that the referendum came up on an "off-year", so turnout was horribly low, old, and uninformed. I really think it would have had a better shot if it had come up during a presidential year when turnout was better.
I believe that the problem is that Al Franken wasn't sworn in until well after that session was well under way, Senator Ted Kennedy was missing for many votes due to his brain cancer, and Arlen Specter didn't switch sides until much much later. There were a few other Democratic Senators who were either out or "Blue Dog" and "DINOs" - the Democratic "Party" is actually more of a loose coalition. The Democrats had the seats, perhaps, but nothing more, for a total of 72 days.
(Reprinted from the last time I did this comment.)
The problem in closing Gitmo is that there have NEVER been enough people in Congress who are willing to take the political hit of letting anyone leave; witness the fact that we captured Chinese Uyghurs back in 2002, determined they weren't terrorists in 2008, and FINALLY released the last of them in 2014. These were GUYS WE KNEW WERE INNOCENT FOR SIX YEARS and still hadn't let go.
Of course, the administrative fee for going to court was $125 - as much as the ticket itself. So what did I gain, except the loss of half a day?
In the City of Chicago, the court fee for arguing a parking ticket is MORE THAN THE TICKET. I learned that the hard way, when a "No Parking" sign was pointing at a hydrant, but apparently the "No Parking" zone extended another 100 feet to the next intersection. Pay $50, or go to court for $65? (These prices are from 10 years ago; I can't believe it's gotten better since then.)
How do you tell if someone is a vegetarian? You don't, they tell you.
Fair enough, and that's pretty funny.
Actually, there are so many cultural events tied around food that there's really no choice. Going to a wedding? Choice between chicken and beef. "Hot dog party day" at school? Hungry day at school. Group of people at work going out for lunch? Oh, great; someone picked the one place that puts "fish taco" under "vegetarian". When my wife was in the hospital with our first, the "vegetarian" option on the meal plan was a turkey sandwich... idiots.
There's a fair amount of debate that many of the Jewish food laws were intentionally created to keep them from mixing with the general population.
Hate to be the one to point out the obvious... but the solution is not in changing the meat it is in reducing and/or eliminating the meat.
Slate recently had a decent article examining all of the impacts of a world that's entirely vegetarian. Interesting stuff.
(My family is vegetarian, even my kids. People stopped asking "where do you get your protein?" when they see my kids, who each were tallest in grade school. My youngest daughter was 5'6" at age 10.)
Apart from it being a Religious term (in the Bible, it mentions that marriage is between a husband and wife, being man and woman).
That's part of the base scripture. Apparently the word of God.
And some parts say that a marriage is between a man and a woman and a woman and a woman... King Solomon, his 700 wives and 300 concubines come to mind.
Which part is the "base"? Which part is the "word"?
Not being facetious, but using the Bible to define marriage, or allow for slavery, or capital punishment, or... Well, there needs to be a stronger case on how to run a multi/non-religious society other than "my book says so...(let me find the right part)"
There seems to be no concept of a middle ground, no grey. Everything is either black or white. How did it end up like this?
Well, a "winner-take-all" election system didn't help. It led us to this place where politicians must increasingly pull away from the middle. If you have too much overlap with your opponent, then there's less to distinguish you from them, and no reason to vote for you. The concentration of power into two parties over time exaggerates the effect.
Newt Gingrich made use of television to really amp up the effect, and the splintering of media into self-reinforcing channels meant you didn't have to seriously consider any other viewpoints any more.
Water saving measures have drained funds from water taxes that are used to maintain the infrastructure...
The smarter towns do what many other (often private) utilities do - have a line item for "fixed costs" and another for "usage". You get a fixed charge of $10-20 for access to the utility, and then a per watt-liter-whatever charge for usage. Even if you use NOTHING, that flat cost comes in every month.
Water billing is largely done on a city/village/town basis. Often, the water comes from a common-source (county 'water agency') which passes on costs to the smaller towns feeding off of it.
Now: if someone along the way mismanages it, that's a different problem.
Someone PLEASE mod this up some more. I screwed around with ftp, Google+, and a few other options, but BT Sync beat everything. I installed it on the PC, installed it on the phone, and in the space of a few hours I had 9GB of pictures and videos copied across Wifi from my phone to the PC. Whenever I add a picture on the phone, it appears on the computer. You choose the type of sync (read-write or read-only) and let it fly.
The Android App defaults to only operate when on Wifi, so data charges stay low (but you can override). There's a nice GUI on the Windows/Mac side, but also configuration files that are pretty well-documented online; you could, for example, share your local Windows profile directory, but choose to exclude the Local Settings directory and any file that begins with a ~. My next step is to work with some friends and family to operate as each others' "Crashplan". You can even share to multiple locations, for redundancy.
They have a pretty thorough FAQ and forum. It also works directly off a LAN, so no data necessarily leaves the house. Closed source, but I suppose you could run a Wireshark if you're suspicious. Everything is transmitted with encryption, but is decrypted at the target. If you don't trust the target machine, I suppose you could store a TrueCrypt drive and just share that.
Last week someone was asking for a good DR solution for their home machine. This works for the phone, too.
and the senate (by filibuster proof majority).
This idea that the Democrats had a filibuster-proof majority from 2008-2010 is a myth.
I believe that the problem is that Al Franken wasn't sworn in until well after that session was well under way, Senator Ted Kennedy was missing for many votes due to his brain cancer, and Arlen Specter didn't switch sides until much much later. There were a few other Democratic Senators who were either out or "Blue Dog" and "DINOs". The Democrats had the seats, perhaps, but nothing more, for a total of 72 days.
Add in the wrinkle that the Republican definition of "compromise" (as a sibling post notes) became "my way or the highway" - candidate Richard Mourdock of Indiana as a vocal, but failed, example of that. Republicans who followed him went on the record unwilling to take even $1 of new taxes for $10 of cuts, and the Speaker of the House is generally unwilling to bring a bill forward until he has a majority of his party behind it - aka "The Hastert Rule", which Dennis Hastert himself disavowed.
Just a quick question - I thought recording requires consent from both parties? Or is this just for phone conversations? Can you record audio anywhere then use that for evidence later on? Esp. on private premises?
It varies with the jurisdiction (state) and who specifically is being recorded. For example, in Illinois it was recently illegal to record police, even in public. The courts eventually found the law to be invalid. There are also distinctions for whether recording contains video AND audio, or just one part. The "premises" thing may come into play here, as he was likely onsite at the theater during questioning.
Down-the-line, this is going to cause further havoc when dealing with medical and legal issues such as schooling. The non-biological mother will be unable to visit the child in the emergency room without the biological mother there first, nor will she be able to make any necessary decisions in care. Doctors will be restricted from telling this "roommate" mother any medical information without pre-approval, although giving her medical power-of-attorney may help.
I remember during one of the Bush 2 nationally televised debates; All of the Republican hopefuls were on stage and the question was asked “do you believe in evolution” – not a single one on stage raised their hand.
TLDR: In May 2007, the GOP hopefuls were asked "How many of you don’t believe in evolution?". Even McCain, who had just a month before said that he liked evolution, changed his mind.
I'd like to see someone come up with a steganographic RAID-ish storage volume.
Sounds like a variation on a "PAR" archive. It may be that a combination of PAR with a TrueCrypt volume way to go. If someone could do PAR as a FUSE project, then you'd be partway there. This would still be missing the steganography angle, and I don't see anything to help that along.