Comment Re:It's not this is different (Score 2) 109
People do resist change, and the pace of change is strong.
We're entering an era of sort-of works AI code, shitty AI code, some that is quite good and works until something breaks, a minor amount that can withstand the change of tech and especially other AI coding trends, and a parallel universe of humans coding along side these changes.
We went from machine code to primitive if highly capable languages to C to Java to Py to Go, and most languages are improvements on and compared to basic languages. All will continue to evolve.
There are still dial-up people, and some with 10gig to their desktop at home. In the middle of the bell curve, many are just trying to get by.
Already, the advanced world is starting to reject fridges with browsers, the morass of center-console touch screen drive-time options, and Reboot #6 of their favorite CGI superhero canon, not to mention fried gaming environments.
AI is stuck on what we did, not what we can do. Learn what "can do" means, and reject the premise of the captioned OP. This person leads a flock of lemmings from a cliff because the fundamentals win, just like you can't change physics.
The AI adherents that stand as lemmings prove Darwin. Again.