I don't know why your reading comprehension is so bad. I would have totally preferred it if any of them knew how to drive a manual or wanted to learn how. But they didn't. How does that make *me* sexist?
Sometimes I wake up and start doing new science. But usually I just roll over and go back to sleep.
The biggest deterrent: Girlfriends and/or wives. They don't know how to operate one, and they have zero interest in learning how. Now you have all sorts of logistical problems.
America will retake the lead in AI the same way we did with EVs: Just ban the ones from China. Problem solved.
pay for access to insider(outsider?) trading info?
He's creating a "middle class" - they will get the info after the regular insiders, but before hoi polloi.
He should have thought of selling multiple levels of higher tiers.
For a small fee you can get your bullshit before everyone else.
I don't think Google should be required to provide anonymized search data to rivals. Firstly, that's effectively their intellectual property.
Oh, I wouldn't worry about that. I'm sure the others will do something transformative with the data.
The summary says: "Microsoft also addressed three zero-day flaws, including two that are already being exploited in the wild. "
(scratches head) How can a flaw be called zero-day and already be exploited in the wild?
Because a zero-day is any flaw made public before the developer knows about it. One of the main ways this happens is by noticing that hackers are breaking into systems using a heretofore unknown exploit.
It's the time change that's the problem. Otherwise being near the timezone border would be an issue.
I should have added:
"In general, renaming things does not fix a problem."
Though heaven knows, lots of stupid people try it.
Why not just discard the whole idea of DST instead of putting it into permanent effect?
The whole concept is an attempt to redefine time as a way of addressing perceived social problems. Schedule activities around the clock, not the clock around activities.
Not surprised that someone exploited a vulnerability, but surprised that deployed military personnel are allowed to use civilian communication systems.
Outer space is OUTSIDE of the United States.
Your statement would apply if these data center space nutters could certify that everything they launch will reach escape velocity.
For everything else, what goes up, must come down. Right back into our jurisdiction.
I'm having a bit of trouble working up any sympathy, as the saying goes.
We can't afford to let the success of big tech companies depend on the health of fragile meatbags. We need to get resilient, fault-tolerant AGI in there running the enterprise. Also, unlike meatbags, you don't need $100M stock payouts to convince an AGI to work as a corporate executive.
If it smells it's chemistry, if it crawls it's biology, if it doesn't work it's physics.
