If you like the current Gnome layout, you'll find plenty to like about MacOS.
The parent post's criticism of MacOS applies equally to Gnome. Gnome has been mimicking the MacOS UI for years now. It's why I use KDE.
The last 15 years when Apple hasn't had a real mass consumer machine except for the mac mini have been kind of an exception.
If you're talking about a span of hundreds of years, a span of 15 years may be an exception. A span that's one third of the company's existence is not.
Regardless of anything else, no one should need a constitutional amendment to do this. This can just be a regular statute law.
If it were a regular law, a state court could potentially invalidate it for violating the state constitution in some way.
If you hook up to electricity from Quebec then your coffee pot is going to make poutine and your TV will only ever play hockey.
I fail to see the problem here.
by the way it's not even a children's charity. It's actually some religious organization masquerading as a children's charity to scam people into giving money to their church. That makes them extra-double-super loathsome.
If I remember correctly, it isn't quite that bad. I think it's for a religious school, so it is money being spent on children and not a scam by religious leaders to make money for themselves. It certainly isn't transparent in the ads, and I wouldn't blame anyone for not wanting to donate to them.
If it's a question of legality, then Claude is *not* the one to ask; the court should know the answer to that question without having to consult anybody but the current laws.
Of course the prosecutors and judge already knew the answer. That's why the prosecutors did it - to show that the defendant should have known (by simply asking, if he didn't already know) that an LLM is not an attorney and therefore not covered by any attorney privilege.
The prosecutors wouldn't have done the exercise if they didn't know what result they would get.
If you think the system is working, ask someone who's waiting for a prompt.
