You could refute that trivially by clearly stating what problem it actually solves. Yet you chose not to do that.
Even if I were a normal healthy person, all veganism would get me is a nutritional deficiency.
Although I'm with the guy that rightly pointed out that these cows would still be a problem if we left things "au naturel" since bison covered the states that now grow corn for cattle feed.
The vegans are advocating genocide of one form or another.
Except fascism and communism don't generate better outcomes. They just lead to more corruption and less effective outcomes.
This is why American had guns and butter and the Soviets just had guns.
No, not really. What the FAA has to say is really meaningless. The relevant trial court judge has all of the real power (and real say) here.
Yes. Just decide suddenly to stop using the monopoly that has had a choke hold on the industry for 30 years. That may well be longer than you've even been around.
Gamers don't actually like Windows. They just tolerate it for the ecosystem.
Well, no one with any sense in IT goes anywhere near this close to the bleeding edge. This thing as all things similarly new should be relegated for testing and experimentation.
Although my own personal opinion is that I feel sorry for Windows users...
Well, not to defend Microsoft, but this behavior is probably the most effective way to get the kinds of people who need to be kicked off of IE to actually be kicked off of IE. You know, the users who probably wouldn't even notice that Edge isn't IE in the first place.
The rest of us can take care of ourselves.
Out of all the stupid, evil or self-centered things Microsoft does, this one's frankly pretty low on my list.
I've been living with Windows 8 because I can work around most of the stupidities, but when I bought my wife a new laptop with 8, she hated it so much she traded it to one of the kids for their Windows 7 machine.
If I could ask for one thing in Windows 10, it would be the ability to make the desktop look like Windows 2000. That's the last version of Windows I thought actually looked good (although 7 wasn't bad). But with this stupid cult of "flat" you can't even do that any more. That was one of Microsoft's stupider and more arrogant moves in the UI field, because you could easily write a book out of all the many reasons why the "flat" look is inferior. The flat look is like reverting back to Windows 2, although at least with Windows 2, the color palette was so small stuff didn't all run together.
Mandated insurance makes no sense. It's not sufficient to cover anything but the most trivial accident. Compared to the costs and risks involved it's a completely token gesture.
Yep. I can't remember the last time I chose to use Internet Explorer.
Well, you need something to download a browser on a clean install of Windows. Is it possible to do that with PowerShell?
So supposably, for all intensive purposes, he meant "case in point", right?
It was those fat French* who demanded that Microsoft deliver an OS without a web browser at all, wasn't it?
* I'll assume Gerard Depardieu represents all French people, just like McDonalds represents all American cuisine and heavy drinking represents all Irish.
You are a clueless idiot.
I bet you're too young to have ever programmed a VCR.
It's not anything remotely comparable to what we're talking about here. If VCRs were like Win 3.1 people would have less of an excuse for their clock to be blinking at 12:00.
You're on crack.
There's a reason that Microsoft finally created a MacOS knockoff in Win95. It's a much better interface.
Up to that point, it was pretty much no contest. It wasn't just MacOS but pretty much EVERYTHING else was easier to use than what Microsoft was trying to sell.
The only reason that any version of Windows ever made more impact was the fact that Microsoft was the dominant software vendor. Their product was force fed everywhere. It took very little effort to improve on whatever the current version of DOS and Windows was.