The way to make money on it is to buy stock in those companies. Or stock in their customers, who are selling more stuff.
If you manage to get the timing anywhere close to right you can sell that stock and then buy real estate at foreclosure sales.
If a society can't adapt to post-scarcity then that society should get eliminated. That's just about the dumbest reason for self destruction you can imagine.
The cotton gin. It was all down hill after that.
Sure. Everyone should learn Latin in school. Greek first though. You don't properly apprciate Latin if you don't already have Greek. Then a few modern languages, at least one Romance to follow the Latin plus a Germanic and some form of Chinese. Better throw in Japanese and something with click consonants too. Practical math absolutely, and shop and don't forget home ec. Advanced math too... none of this "choosing" to take calculus. Science classes should cover physics, biology and chemistry for everyone, to an advanced level. Some economics, sociology and anthropology too, and definitely comprehensive history. Every child should graduate knowing how to fix a toilet, maintain their brakes and perform competent Japanese joinery.
His surname is one transposition away from "AI Mode".
Yeah, because all even/all odd is (from basic statistics) rare, and happens to be rarer than the percentage of people who play all-even or all-odd, so you'd be more likely to split any winnings.
Epstein seemed to have a penchant for putting commas in random places. He used double commas too, for some reason. Epstein seems to have really liked commas and just sprinkled them liberally through his e-mails like glitter.
An anecdote is not correlation. It's not even weak evidence of a correlation.
Skinner, 1948, "'Superstition' in the Pigeon."
Modern models will take into account statistical biases in lotteries. For example, here's ChatGPT:
Pick good lottery numbers for the Virginia powerball lottery
Good question. First, a reality check: Powerball is pure chance — there’s no “good” numbers that are more likely to win. Every set of 5 white balls (1–69) + 1 Powerball (1–26) has exactly the same probability.
wwwuat.valottery.com
+1That said, I can give you a few tips + a sample “random but balanced” pick, if you’d like to pick your own numbers rather than use Quick Pick.
Some tips when choosing your Powerball numbers
Spread your numbers
Try to pick a mix across the range (low, mid, high). According to lottery-strategy advice, not clustering all your numbers in one group is better.
samlotto.comAvoid patterns
Many people pick birthdays, anniversaries, or sequential numbers. That’s fine—but if you win, you might have to share with more people because these are popular picks.
lotteryvalley.comUse “due” or “hot” numbers carefully
Some sites (like lottery-analysis tools) track which numbers are “hot” (drawn recently) or “overdue” (haven’t appeared in a while). But remember: past draws don’t change future odds.
m.lottostrategies.comMix even and odd
According to some statistical analyses, it’s less likely to draw all odd or all even numbers.
samlotto.comPlay responsibly
Odds of winning the Powerball jackpot are extremely long: 1 in ~292 million.
lotterycritic.comSample “balanced” Powerball pick
Here’s a random-but-balanced combination you could use just for fun (or as a basis to tweak):
White balls: 8, 23, 41, 57, 65
Powerball: 12
If you like, I can generate 5 different “smart random” picks for the next Virginia Powerball draw (balanced by probability and number distribution). Do you want me to do that?
It's a damned shame '99942 Apothis' will miss us in a few years
It's not too late to fix that.
The thing is, it very much *won't* be random numbers. It's about as far from a random number generator as you can get.
In a really bad model, one would expect it to likely be "numbers it's seen the most in the context of a lottery". But in a good model, esp. a thinking model, one would expect it to think over which sorts of numbers are statistically over-chosen (birthdates, etc) and avoid them in giving its answers.
The funny thing is, think of how this woman will interact with ChatGPT from now on. ChatGPT could say "Abraham Lincoln was married to John Wilkes Booth", and she'd be thinking, "Okay, that sounds really, really wrong, but on the other hand, it picked the right lottery numbers, so..."
I'm not sure why the Internet thinks Bubba is Bill Clinton.
Actually, the Epstein comma seems to be the worst.
I'll go with NHTSA and NASA over the "Barr Group" ambulance chasers, thank you. Barr found that it's possible if you get like a cosmic ray to flip just the right bit you could stick the throttle on (but still not make it overpower the brakes). NHTSA and NASA investigated not just the software but the actual cases. In not a single actual case that they investigated did they find that it wasn't well explained by either stuck pedals or pedal misapplication (mainly the latter).
Single tasking: Just Say No.
