EA specifically makes a lot of its money from having agreements with other big companies: FIFA, NFL, NHL, F1, NBA, etc. That requires a lot of money that the employees probably don't have, and also probably multi-year exclusive contracts EA has locked up.

However, they could quit and go make new games instead of adding a few more polys to the models and updating the database of player names every year. Maybe ask the union for some startup capital. Helping employee-owned companies get started would seem to be an excellent goal for a union.

Bullshit. The US had the same freakout when it was Japan, a staunch ally with a higher quality democracy than the US and nonagression written right into its constitution.

You should take the GPs advice and click on the link.

China's electrical generation didn't just overtake the US and it certainly isn't going to "overtake in the future." It overtook around 2010. Its now about 2x and growing possibly exponentially while the US pretty much levelled off around 2010.

Yes. The US should stop comparing itself to a country that's four times as large, at least in absolute terms. However, they insist on doing so. Possibly rates and ratios were one of those educational things politicians were not in favour of.

It's total electrical generation. Not solar. It's also the first line of the summary, and a big 'ol graph front and centre as the very first thing in the article at the sole link.

It'll work fine with a 65 watt charger. You might possibly be able to note a charge time difference if you completely drain the battery and use a stopwatch, but I doubt it. Apparently 20 W phone chargers also work fine, although more slowly.

Lol. AVS is part of the USB specification. It's not proprietary. In USB PD 3.2 it's required if you want to deliver more than 27 W.

Not if you're even further right.

Collective punishment is fine if you're choosing to be there. Search "BDSM group punishment" on pornhub.

Much of the body positivity movement just says you shouldn't be mean to fat people, or anyone else, because of their body shape. That's what the words mean: body positivity.

There are some crazy body positivity types who actually claim that any amount of obesity is just fine and has no adverse health implications at all, despite mountains of evidence to the contrary (although I haven't met any that think anorexia is cool). That is indeed RFK Jr style crazy.

Wah, BMI is a stupid measure because I am all muscles!

Okay, we came up with much better criteria based on clinically validated measures like waist to hip ratio.

Wah, moving the goalposts! Now pass me the cheetos.

Not exactly apples-to-apples. That's like saying there is no experimental evidence that an addition problem with n+1 digits where n is the most anyone has bothered to actually add can be performed.

Besides my statement being just as true as the one I quoted, it is indeed "apples-to-apples."

You can break factoring-based public key enrcryption with quantum computers, just like you can do with classical computers. Both problems are scaling up. Both problems have possible fundamental limits in the way of scaling up to current key lengths. The difference is that for classical computing we know we're already bumping into those limits.

There is definitely theoretical evidence that movement in time can go in any direction, FTL (hello warp), and transporters can be things

An episode of Star Trek isn't theoretical evidence. There's no (definitive) theoretical evidence those things are impossible, but that's not the same as theoretical evidence that they are possible.

AI =/= LLM.

It's not that funny. Purges of the military and government are pretty standard practice when taking over a country. You kick out anybody who can't be relied upon to support you. The problem is there tend not to be a big pool of both qualified and politically reliable replacements so by emphasizing the latter the former suffers.

Examples:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

Three years of launches, and they have yet to complete an orbit.

It's too bad you lead with this bullshit. Purposely putting their giant rocket within a fart of reaching a stable orbit is a demonstration of exquisite control, not failure. There's absolutely no reason they won't be "reaching orbit" whenever they like next year.

Rendezvous is tricky, but they already do it all the time, and with much higher stakes. Orbital fuel transfer has been done (including by SpaceX IIRC), doing it again with Starship wouldn't really be too surprising. I would be surprised if they have a finished version of a fuel depot a year from now, but not so much if they stick a stripped down Starship up there to practice on.

I'd be really surprised if they fulfill their HLS contract next year, but I'll also be surprised if they don't beat Blue Origin, Lockheed and Boeing, and with a much more capable lander at a lower cost. Artemis looks like it's been watered down into another flag planting mission, but maybe SpaceX will be able to sell lunar transport to somebody who actually wants to do something interesting. Blue Origin and Co definitely won't be.

Mars, whatever.