Forgot your password?

typodupeerror

Comment: Re:No Right to Anonimity when Committing a Crime (Score 1) 342

Nothing beefs up an argument better than bringing the Nazis into it.

While you may feel that broken windows and other acts of vandalism and the fear they instill are not worth pursuing, you would probably feel differently if it was your window that was broken or your family that was scared for their safety.

Some have called these crimes "victimless", but they are not. We are all victims of these useless crimes. We all pay the cost of the cleanup - either through higher costs passed along by the businesses affected or higher insurance rates to cover the losses.

Comment: Re:No Right to Anonimity when Committing a Crime (Score 1) 342

A lot of people don't understand that, when you attack the police, you are not making a statement against authority, you are attacking the community served by the police.

I must distinguish that I am not talking about acting against the unjust actions of a police officer, but the unprovoked attacks against people that we, as a community, entrust with preserving the public order. There are many just arguments that individual police officers committed offences during the protests (and some of been deservedly repremanded), but no one car argue that a police vehicle sitting in the street did them wrong.

Those police vehicles were destroyed in a wanton rampage and no matter how long they were left there, there can be no justification for torching them.

Comment: No Right to Anonimity when Committing a Crime (Score 4, Interesting) 342

I think it's about time there was a response to this Black Bloc crap. No one should have the right to anonymity preserved in the comission of a crime.

The purpose of protest is to be noticed. Too many people are using legetimate protest as a cover for hooliganism, and it's a shame.

While 10 years is a lot, it's the maximum. I'd be surprised if it wasn't just double the maximum for doing the same thing without a mask, which seems perfectly fair to me. I think the majority of cases will involve people in masks being arrested, identified and released without charge. Hopefully it will reverse the trend of anonymous violence embedded in legitimate protest.

Cellphones

HTC Finally Releases Hero Source Code 123

Posted by timothy
from the shouldn't-heroes-be-more-forthcoming? dept.
An anonymous reader writes "After months of prodding by developers, HTC has finally released the long-requested Android source code for the HTC Hero. This follows up on a recent report on Slashdot concerning device manufacturer HTC's perceived stonewalling over releasing source code for the device after repeated attempts to initially obtain source were met with vague responses."
Networking

When Accredited Domain Name Registrars Drop Dead! 1

Submitted by
Mike
Mike writes "What do you do when your accredited domain name registrar drops dead? What happens to your domain? Mouzz Interactive at mouzz.com is an ICANN accredited registrar, but on July 19 their domain name expired and their website disappeared. I found out because I have domains registered with them, and I was in the process of renewing a domain name that expires next month, when I was unable to complete the transaction. Now their site is unreachable, so I have no access to my control panel. I cannot renew my domain, and because it's locked, I cannot transfer it. I cannot contact Mouzz because none of their contact emails will work. So now my site, which is listed on google's front page for imporatnt search terms, is going to disappear too. I have contacted ICANN and pointed out that they are listing an accredited registrar that doesn't exit, but they have made no response. I have complained to InterNic whose response is that they will forward my complaint to the registrar (duh... how they didn't say) How am I going to get my domains back? How many people like me are now completely screwed because they have lost control of their domains? If you don't think this is an interesting story then consider this. It could happen to your domain, or even slashdot.org"
The Internet

Canadian Gov't asks Public about new Copyright Law

Submitted by
Mike Lawrie
Mike Lawrie writes "The so-called Canadian DMCA has had a long history. Historically, proposed legislation has favoured the views of CRIA, the Canadian arm of the RIAA almost completely. However, this time around the government is consulting the public before drafting the bill. They have launched a (linux-based!) website designed to provide a public forum for discussion. Now is the time to speak up."
Idle

Yelling At Telemarketers Is A "Terroristic Thr->

Submitted by
BotScout
BotScout writes "An Ohio man, fed up with deceptive junk mail, made the mistake of losing his temper while on the phone with a St. Louis company pitching an extended auto-service contract. Now he finds himself behind bars, where he is charged with making a terrorist threat and is being held on $45,000 bond. According to court documents, Charles W. Papenfus, 43, allegedly told a sales representative during a May 18 telephone call that he would burn down the building and kill the employees and their families. He was indicted for making a terrorist threat, a Class D felony; and he could be sentenced to up to four years in prison if convicted. I get a lot of this kind of junk mail too, but I usually just call their 800 number and waste as much of their time as possible."
Link to Original Source
Government

Canada Review Copyright Laws 1

Submitted by Anonymous Coward
An anonymous reader writes "It looks as if Canada is going to take a harder look at copyright law reform instead of falling into lockstep with the American/international model. While "consultations" are sometimes just a cover for ramming through unpopular legislation, the Canadian government has legitimately come out with good legislation after such exercises."

The appreciation of the average visual graphisticator alone is worth the whole suaveness and decadence which abounds!!

Working...