Forgot your password?

typodupeerror

Comment: Microsoft uses dirty tactics (Score 2) 492

by AftanGustur (#39909579) Attached to: Is Google the New Microsoft?
Google simply develops a similar technology themselves.

Microsoft makes a "cooperation" deal with companies to work together on their technology, steals the sourcecode/technology and then ends the contract.

This was the case with IBM's OS/2, Corel Word, Oracle's Database and Stac Electronics' "Stacker" where Bill Gates himself famously lied in a sworn testimony about the theft.

These are just from the top of my head, I am sure people can come up with other examples.

Comment: Re:Security through obscurity (Score 1) 333

by AftanGustur (#39887151) Attached to: Osama Bin Laden Didn't Encrypt His Files

How are we supposed to know they're legitimate? Hell, how are we supposed to know that they actually killed him? No real evidence has been shown, never mind a body. A case built on "evidence" like presented so far would be laughed out of even a kangaroo court!

Are you suggesting uncle Sam has some kind of a Psychological Operations unit that tells lies to play with our believes?

Comment: Same old, same old (Score 0) 310

by AftanGustur (#39188977) Attached to: Users Spend More Time On Myspace Than Google+
The problem with G+ is that Google just copied Facebook, there is nothing new or interesting there.

You have a "profile", and you "post status updates", which your "friends" can "comment on" or "like".

No matter hot you look at it, if you remove the nice animations and colors you have the same system. The differences are not enough for people for switch.

Google needs to do something new and daring, and G+ isn't it.

I predict that there will be a Facebook-killer, but it will have to go where Google is afraid to go, it will be mostly a placeholder for content that you post where you want on the internet.

Comment: Scientists? (Score 2, Interesting) 1367

by AftanGustur (#38853535) Attached to: Don't Worry About Global Warming, Say 16 Scientists in the WSJ

The fact is that CO2 is not a pollutant. CO2 is a colorless and odorless gas, exhaled at high concentrations by each of us, and a key component of the biosphere's life cycle.'"

With the same logic we can say that "shit" it not a polluant, and therefore we can dump it directly into lakes and rivers.

Comment: Re:MS Taking Aggressive Steps Against MALWARE On A (Score 1) 675

by AftanGustur (#38696942) Attached to: Microsoft Taking Aggressive Steps Against Linux On ARM

There, fixed the title for you. This is a security feature. The funny thing is that this is exactly what Linux users have been asking for. They have been bitching about bad security of Windows, and now that Microsoft takes good and required steps to improve it, they start bitching how the security features lock out Linux. What about thinking before opening your mouth in the future? And why not bitch at Apple for locking down OS X and iPhone's too?

Users want "security features" that protect them from evil, not "security features" that protect evil from them.

Microsoft is scared that the shiny hardware that is required to run Windows will be bought and used to run (faster) with another OS. This has very little to do with protecting Users against anything but a lot to do with limiting user's options.

The question of whether computers can think is just like the question of whether submarines can swim. -- Edsger W. Dijkstra

Working...