Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:what if there was a better monetary incentive (Score 1) 144

IBM underpays.

Which also supports my point. It means my ~$65k salary in 1999 was potentially lower than it should have been, which strengthens the case that the poster's claim of $80-90k being the norm for Ph.D.'d data scientists in the Bay area is a huge exaggeration.

Comment Re:Read below to see what Bennett has to say. (Score 1) 622

Perhaps the Lawrence-blamers skew conservative, but I'd not be so quick to color them with one brush. There's a certain brand of person I like to call "arrogant techie dude", in no short supply on slashdot, who bucks the trend. He unswervingly believes in evolution and AGW, is pro-choice, holds theists in disdain if not outright contempt, will support almost any effort at manned space exploration (cost be damned). But he has no patience for anyone who is suffering due to his or her own mistakes (such as, for instance, storing nude pics in the cloud). He's very much of the view that if someone's situation is shitty that it must be his own fault and he should just pull himself up by the bootstraps. (Oddly, a frame of mind most often ascribed to conservatives.)

Comment Re:Said it before, say it again (Score 1) 144

who in their right mind would go into computer science in America right now?

Someone who enjoys coding. Someone who likes being compensated pretty well without having work lawyer-hours. You can whine about H1-B visas all you want, but the situation for software devs is pretty comfortable.

Comment Re:I wonder (Score 1) 144

I've been working for 15 years. In that time, I've held five jobs. The shortest of them lasted 2 years, and that's because I chose to leave. I have no vendor certifications nor would it help me to obtain them. At my current company we hardly ever do reviews. Maybe my experience isn't representative, but, then again, maybe yours wasn't either.

Comment Re:Is this really an important fact? (Score 1) 144

The city where I grew up had about the same population (when I was living there) as Wyoming's current population. It was urban, but not especially progressive and not located in a state known for its awesome education system. We probably had 10 people take the AP C.S. exam at my school alone. Granted, it was a magnet school with an engineering focus, but I'm sure there were also some other exam-takers from the other schools in my district. So something weird is going on in Wyoming.

Comment Re:what if there was a better monetary incentive (Score 1) 144

Your claim is as hard to believe as his. With a master's degree in C.S. I started at about $65k in 1999. At IBM. In a market with a much lower cost-of-living than California and with correspondingly lower salaries. And the position I was hired into was pretty junior. So it's hard for me to believe that a guy with a Ph.D. getting a job in a hot field and in a hot market would come in making $85-90k.

Comment Re:Don't bother with AP CS (Score 1) 144

I got credit for mine. Let me skip the intro course. Even if only gets you credit for a course intended for non-majors that can still potentially boost your GPA. Having the high score might also help you get admitted to more selective schools. Not taking the test when you have a reasonable chance of scoring highly seems like pretty terrible advice.

Comment what we'd want to see... (Score 2) 547

What we'd want to see is a ranking of languages by "new project starts" utilizing that language. There's still COBOL around but how many new projects are started that use COBOL? Etc. I suspect few people starting a project today that requires a Perl-like language would actually choose Perl unless they were already a Perl expert and it was definitely going to be a one-man job. They'd choose Python/Ruby/PHP instead. So, in that sense, Perl is dead.

Comment Re:In other news (Score 1) 68

As I understand the summary, the researchers explained 20% of the heritability of height. Not height in general. If I haven't misread things, then 80% of the portion of height that is genetically determined is still unexplained. Diet no doubt has a huge effect on height, but (again, if I'm not misreading things) that's not what's being discussed here.

Slashdot Top Deals

Make sure your code does nothing gracefully.

Working...