...which adds to the point that an email account, that doesn't contain emails about the subject at hand should also be part of a criminal investigation.
I can see pareidolia becoming an issue, with claims that pictures interpreted in a certain way could mean something when they really are just cat pictures.
If *I* worked for wikilieaks, I sure would have an additional freemail account somewhere that I'd use for facebook, slashdot, mailing cat pictures to friends....
I'd have a cunning code involving the colour of kittens and whether they meow or not
Everybody shits.
Except for Kim Jong Un
You can't fix bad government policy with better tech...
But Microsoft is using the opposite tactic and fighting this with bad tech. If the government are spending all their money on licenses and all their efforts trying to integrate proprietary systems then they have less time and resources to snoop on citizens
I'm sorry, Dave, but Red Dwarf was an 80s show. You smeghead arsehole.
Wrong again Rimmer
From Wikipedia:
... aired on BBC Two between 1988 and 1993 and from 1997 to 1999, and on Dave in 2009 and 2012
They have yet to see past Exchange and Office and understand what most people actually do with these things.
You mean watch porn, right?
99% Can seem high degree of protection, however if you work in an area where you meet thousands in a day, it will only be a matter of time before you succumb.
Now if everybody is at 99%.....it is as damn near to impossible as you are going to get.
I think you misunderstand. For 99% it works, no matter what the exposure. For the 1% they will succumb whether exposed to viruses from one infected person or hundreds.
The protection you get from vaccinations is on the "herd" level and not the individual. If the majority of the herd is not vaccinated, the vaccine itself provide very little protection to an individual....
Factually incorrect for most vaccines, which provide a high degree of protection for individuals
How would this work out with employees who have "religious reasons" for not being vaccinated? Could they claim discrimination?
Yes right and you'd let the Muslim employees rape the little girls too because it is emulating "the best of men" in their religion.
No one would be forced to get a vaccination, and everyone has a choice. It would be a condition of employment, anyone would be free to quit if they chose not to get vaccinated.
Provided that there were exemptions for genuine medical reasons (e.g. severe allergy to something in the vaccine), I agree
that they won't disclose to us? I don't know if any of you have ever tried to get this info from Apple, but they really don't make it easy. Or possible.
Just wait until the Chinese leak it online
So, which Linux distro that I installed in 2003 still has active security updates today? Which one even had more than four years of support?
RHEL 4.0 which was available in 2003 and will be given extended support to the end of this month.
Voltaire said it was "difficult to free fools from the chains they revere".
A good example is how many newspaper's refer to "the Prophet Muhammad". Since most readers aren't Muslims it would be much more accurate to say "the False Prophet Muhammad", or at very least "Islam's Prophet Muhammad".
"Gravitation cannot be held responsible for people falling in love." -- Albert Einstein
