Comment Selfie with someone else (Score 1) 135
By including both yourself and someone else in a single portrait.
By including both yourself and someone else in a single portrait.
"This will revolutionize the way people get hurt in traffic accidents."
I really want to like libressl. But it pretends to be openssl badly. They refused a patch that would have mitigated this whole RAND_egd problem by simply returning that it doesn't work when someone tries to use it, which means that you commonly need a patch to use it at all. If it's not going to work like openssl, then it shouldn't occupy the same space in the filesystem.
Fuck you.
And that's why we can't have nice things: because that's the best you can do when you see someone in need.
I've seen no plan that is remotely practical that would allow pre-identification of those allowed,
If you can carry a DNR in your pocket and it's considered practicable, then you can carry a list of persons permitted to contact you in a medical emergency on the same basis.
Even if homosexuality were a disease, I still wouldn't trust the CDC to tell me what percentage of the population had it. And it isn't one.
I recall reading about this experiment. Kids were left free to play with any toys they wanted... and, surprise, they still chose the traditional ones.
The majority of them do, yes. That's fine for them to do. Some of them don't. It's not fine for the majority to force them to do so. It's not fine for the parents to force them to do so. They may be ignorant and out of control tiny little humans, but many adult humans are also ignorant and out of control and we still let them dress how they want and in most states and countries, even fuck who they want given consensuality.
OK nutter, but reduce the argument to a reasonable one — you should be able to designate someone to come see you in the hospital whether you're married or related or not — and we return to there being absolutely no valid reason to not permit you to define the small pool of people who are permitted to see you if you are in the hospital. Speaking for myself, I vehemently do not want my mother permitted into my hospital room for any reason.
Not only various other variations of this (my first PC in particular only had 448kB of RAM, and only 64kB of that was on the mainboard) but my first computer that ran Linux was a 386DX25 with 8MB of RAM and a 120MB disk. And while I threw it away recently, I used to have an iOpener with some kind of rinkydink Linux with an ancient browser on it in just 32MB of disk. ISTR it having 16MB RAM. If anyone would like the wizztronics adapter, I have one here along with a low-profile cooler that fits inside the iOpener's case and is probably worth more than either the machine or the adapter board.
What really ends up happening is the slower horses end up getting dragged along, and the faster horses end up having to work harder
Yeah, if you insist on just dragging the slower members of your team, you're going to have to work pretty hard. If you helped them become more like you, then they would do better at pulling their own weight. And it's clear that just dragging them isn't going to make that happen, at least not quickly. Sure, they may eventually become resentful, but who wants to wait? Maybe there's a better way.
I got four model 135s for free and gave them away to another Tivoli employee (at the time) for the same price. I wonder if they ever got used or if they hit the scrap heap. They were cool but they were too big. If they were PS/2 sized I might still have them
Web server on a 328p? I'm betting it can't do any server-side scripting at all...?
U.S.A.: 32MB
China: 10KB
Guess who's more efficient and guess who's trying to cram spyware into everything.
32KB of RAM? That's luxury. Try 8KB.
Next up: someone who's programmed devices with less than 8KB of RAM.
Sounds like they're a little butt hurt because their product... well, I've never heard of it.
Wow, really?
Their name is Total Recall Technologies. I've heard about them decades ago.
"The one charm of marriage is that it makes a life of deception a neccessity." - Oscar Wilde