Even worse, corporations are subject to summary execution. (Google involuntary dissolution.)
Not even remotely the same.
Since corporations are equally beholden to the law, so should they have an interest in modifying it.
Equally beholden my ass. Corps exist specifically as a shield against the law. The day a corp gets a life sentence in prison you'll have a point.
Your flaw is comparing corps to people. They're not people, and should be compared to other corps.
Maybe in some other context you might be have a pint, but not when it comes to government representation. Politicians are not supposed to represent corps, only people since elections are by the people. Lobbying is a way for corps to purchase representation, therefore it is not acceptable no matter how many corps do it.
Lobbying is more like speeding. If all the traffic around you is going ten miles over the limit, you are NOT contributing to the greater good by adhering to the law. You're making yourself an obstacle.
Doing the right thing can be complex.
You keep digging that hole. Now corporations have a moral imperative to lobby in order to not endanger everyone else? WTF is wrong with you?
You keep missing the key point - corps are a tiny minority, if that, of the citizenry. This isn't a case of all the traffic speeding and them just keeping up, it is a case of 99.99% of the traffic moving at walking speed and this handful of aholes going at 100mph.
I see, so expecting one and only one telco to opt out of the lobbying process is normal behavior, then, is it?
It is truly stunning how you've missed the point. I sincerely believe you are a psychopath now. I'll spell it out
Nor does it mean AT&T is in the wrong. In a world where every telco lobbies, those who employ lobbyists are 'in the neutral'.
Wow. Are you a psychopath?
The W3C has been at the forefront of open standards and an open internet for many years, obviously. So it's somewhat distressing to see it announced this morning that
.
So does the W3C still support open standards?
If that's the terms the government wants, they can set those terms.
Since AT&T's lobbyists were responsible for most of the terms, I'm comfortable with Vanderhoth's original assessment. Just because our government representatives were corrupted doesn't mean AT&T is in the right.
"I've seen it. It's rubbish." -- Marvin the Paranoid Android