Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Why isn't public transport 'free'? (Score 1) 198

Because in most places, public transport is ran by the government and governments/politicians have a tendency to make businesses and contributors happy, not their constituents. Most public transport thus does not run where YOU want to go but rather where people go to spend money, where contributors have lobbied the thing to be built and whatever other decisions make the now privatized bus companies the most money (cutting lines, frequency and convenience while increasing costs and filling vehicles well beyond their capacity).

Comment Re:Not just Apple laptops, No drivers for new lapt (Score 1) 209

Millions of dollars? If your OS had a decent and open ABI, there is no reason the actual interaction of your code with the system could be traversed and tested in a fortnight. I've never seen any company dumping millions of dollars in a single version of a driver, a few thousands at best (and most driver code for laptop hardware looks like it was never even tested).

Comment Re: Should be no problem? (Score 1) 94

They're not trying to get the bomb (if you can believe their media). They're trying to power their country without relying on foreign oil or foreign tech since historically, they have been hard hit economically by the instability of the region. The bomb may be secondary but nuclear power is still the cheapest power available (if you ignore the NIMBY and regulation problems western nations face)

Comment Re:Wireless charging hit mainstream ~ 1-2 years ag (Score 1) 184

Yeah, but that's simply inductive charging, basically placing the secondary coil inside or very close to the primary. You still need to have the device in an exact position very close or in the charger for it to work. At that point it doesn't matter whether or not the wires are touching, it's actually more efficient to have the wires touching (and having a charger that is fully reversible and magnetically snaps is optimal at that point).

What I've understood as wireless charging tech has been in concept for years but not yet fully worked out is a wireless charging mat or area where you simply put down your device (eg. on your night stand) and it starts charging. The problem with that is position, area, air gap etc; the tech exists already but they are woefully inefficient and thus put a big strain on the larger batteries.

Comment Re:The Rules (Score 1) 347

It IS relevant to this case. Extra peering connections cost 0, zilch (besides the actual hardware cost which is really minimal if you're just popping in a cable into an existing switch)

At the peering centers, after the obvious monthly colocation fees you simply pay for YOUR traffic towards the Internet (upload) and for YOUR to be reachable across the Internet. You don't pay for the amount of data you transfer, you pay per Mbps that you upload disproportionate to what you accept.

So Netflix is paying an amount of money to upload their data, Comcast gets it for free, if they would actually accept the data, it would reduce their peering costs (not by a whole lot but a couple of thousand/month at least). The problem with Comcast however is that Netflix is disrupting their side business (cable etc) so by spending money in blocking Netflix they hope to recap that by more cable subscriptions.

Slashdot Top Deals

An Ada exception is when a routine gets in trouble and says 'Beam me up, Scotty'.

Working...