Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Hardware not YET efficient enough to scare me.. (Score 1) 469

The hardware is not ready, at least not until they use hardware to build composite mutation-images that show relevant (pixel) changes only. There is no point in trying to parse a single image a second, or -on the opposite side- a video stream.

In my opinion, efficient wearable vision software should ignore lower quality versions of what it already saw, it would make a huge efficiency leap. I believe this architecture ultimately would be a software skeleton for a mental world reconstruction much like humans perceive.

Comment Re:Really? Did we ever really want smart watches? (Score 1) 365

No, it just doesnt enough. People expect the thing to replicate all smartphone functionality, when in fact it only works with the Samsung browser, WhatsApp, S-Calendar, and the default (not gMail) email app.

A bit like the Samsung S-View cover feature. Its nice, but why doesn't it tell me more about individual app notifications? (the same way i do see a face when called)

Comment Maelstrom (Score 1) 1532

The funny thing with terrorism is that it means "scaring people". Which happens to be exactly what "terrorism preventing" does:

Politics found a war terminology, that also depicts its own negative side effects, side effects that actually support the war argument.

There should be a word invented for this maelstrom, because irony is not cutting it.

Comment Yes. (Score 1) 631

I switched to CrunchBang. Its less annoying than the Unity interface (i have no use for its features, they just get in the way and frustrate me) works great on my old (non-pae) notebook.

Now in CrunchBang i just have to right-click to start applications, and manually have to add new applications to that menu, but that was surmountable.

Comment Re:Illusion of privacy (Score 1) 224

Google has been very adamant that the NSA does not have access to their servers.

No, Google did not choose to join a program that would give NSA access.

"we have not joined any program that would give the U.S. government—or any other government—direct access to our servers. "
Source: http://googleblog.blogspot.be/2013/06/what.html

We know nothing about what Google did not choose to do, for all intents and purposes, because the NSA does have this goal i assume they have (or are going to) meet it. Likely in secret.

Furthermore as stated elsewhere encryption is irrelevant, with or without willing cooperation from Google Inc. the NSA is able to decrypt it.

Submission + - NSA Information Dominance Center looks like Startrek Enterprise bridge (theregister.co.uk)

Barryke writes: National Security Agency director Keith Alexander apparently sold the concept of surveillance to members of Congress using an operations centre styled on the bridge of the starship Enterprise from much-loved sci-fi series Star Trek.

The PDF seems down, but pictures are here http://www.dailypaul.com/299358/nope-your-eyes-are-not-lying-to-you-nsa-chief-alexander-is-a-star-trek-captain-dr-strangelove-wannabe.

Well, at least its not the Death Star.

Slashdot Top Deals

There are two ways to write error-free programs; only the third one works.

Working...