Since society wouldn't allow it to happen to humans...
Today's society... with today's moral values. Who knows what things might be like in a hundred years?
Although that sounds vaguely like the premise of some sort of science fiction story that looks at inequalities between classes.
By my understanding, tax breaks being offered on something only mean that you effectively only get some percentage of the money back that you spent on that thing.
But if you aren't spending any of your money on that thing in the first place, even if it would give you a tax break, aren't you still further ahead than if you did spend the money when you can only get part of it back?
Thus spake the master programmer: "After three days without programming, life becomes meaningless." -- Geoffrey James, "The Tao of Programming"