First, instead of linking a page that gives you eye strain and is generally a boil on the ass of the internet, please link to the actual source, as has been pointed out before.

And second, I think this link (the one mentioned above, not the one in TFS) should go to as many leaders of state as possible, just to help them put their own imagined importance into perspective.

I don't know. Why don't you ask the makers of these games.

Oh look. They ain't UT clones. There's a RTS. There is a survival horror game (ok, this now almost forces the "and how many survival horror games..." question). And I think over there's an Adventure game. There's a racing game in there too, go, try to find it!

Erh... that was a comeback to a "your mom" joke. Mod it funny, mod it offtopic, but don't try to reply on topic to it. :)

He didn't state whether the sign was at the door when you're entering or leaving. Considering the silly rules some banks have today, I would not expect them to put it on the sensible side.

Pah! False advertising! Here I was, taking a flight and looking forward to all the juicy TSA agent fondling that I was promised but when I stand there with a "do me, stud" pose and look on my face, he just kinda looked rather ... annoyed and barely touched me.

I want my money back!

The question is not why I wear it.

The question it why it bothers you.

If they're banned, the "no IR emitting glasses" sign doubles as the "here your privacy will be voided" sign.

Gait recognition?

Dammit, THAT's what the ministry of silly walks was about! Those sneaky Brits!

Depends. Do you want to have at least a little bit of privacy?

If there is, and if I was Satan, I'd be worried to be evicted when that guy croaks.

Someone started a single player game and decided to hand over control of his civilization to the adviser?

Facts mattered? Must've been a long time ago.

Money matters. And I don't even want to solve whether the money from those industries that don't want to face expenses to deal with stricter environment laws matters more than that from industries that want to sell the stuff that makes the former compliant with stricter environment laws.

In the old days there may have been some scientific process to determine who's right. You know, with thesis, antithesis and discussion. Today it's way easier: Whoever contributes the most campaign money is right.

Yes, and we're hell bent at making sure no matter what they'd try they won't get out.

You know how to not only kill a joke but bury it and hold the funeral speech...

Yet still our best telescopes can barely make out its shape.