Peer review at this level is. Did you do a reasonable experiment. Have you identified errors etc. The NASA ones did not even pass that.

Strong words from an AC.

I got the math slightly wrong on that post. However, it is still true that any reactionless drive is also a over unity device.

Lets say i have this thing on a plane traveling at constant speed. The power *output* in the stationary frame of reference is simple force times distance traveled per second. pout=fv. No matter how much energy is needed to create the force f, there is always some velocity v that means pout is larger than power in.

You can also do the calculations based on total energy. You still get more out (more kinetic energy) than you put in. Lets say we use input power P for a force output of f. Our craft has mass m. Acceleration is a=fm. After time t the power input is Pt. Velocity is at, and the kinetic energy is .5*m*t^2*a^2. Since kinetic energy is going up by a factor of t^2 it is easy to see that at some time t>T, it will be larger than total energy input. We can find that characteristic time by solving tP=.5*m*t^2*a^2 for t. T=2*P/(m*a^2).

The result can be generalized to any frame of reference. ANY reactionless drive is a over unity device in some characteristic time eventually.

Err not really. You have to violate a bunch of things widely held to be true for real mass configurations. Also you need negative mass, which doesn't exist even theoretically, oh and more mass energy than the entire universe. Finally it is totally causally disconnected from the rest of the universe.

Just because i write down math does not make it a valid prediction.

Little p and big P. Really that is the math. Do it yourself. Reactionless drives are *always* a over unity device in some characteristic time.

Because all scientists are clearly infallible which climate models (read the papers!), but dark matter, conservation of momentum/energy then obviously all scientists are total idiots.

I'm bully on ARM, with the (almost) collapse of AMD as a "first rate" processor, it's good to see Intel get some serious competition in a significant market space.

My only beef with ARM is that comparing CPUs is harder than comparing video cards! the ARM space is so fragmented with licensed cores and seemly random numbers indicating the "version" that I have no idea how, for example, a SnapDragon 808 processor compares to a Cortex A9 or an Apple A7.

Really, I'm lost. But the $40 TV stick with the 4x core A9 works pretty well...

Angel is a regular here and often goes on and on about germany and in particular its wind and solar energy with totally crazy and provably incorrect claims with utility (often in the links he/she provides). He/she also comes up with crazy stuff about how many people have been killed with nuclear and stuff.

The same is true for Uranium. Since a Thorium fuel cycle *burns* 233U it also still has decay heat. Throttling down can be done, but heat dumps are required. Not hard to do since even conventional generation often needs that. Thorium is not magic and homogenous reactors not restricted to Th.

Because it is not global warming :D

IF you really do have a reactionless drive. You really do have a free lunch. It is a over unity device.

The output power of a device traveling at speed v with force f is p=fv (work per unit time=force x distance per unit time). if the power force coefficient is k such that f=kP where P is the input power. Then once traveling at speed v=1/k output is higher than input. Your getting free energy. You can generalize this for total energy and arbitrary frames of reference pretty easily.

That energy is called drag. In fact it has been shown that the Bussard ramjet won't work because of that drag.

Microwaves are photons. If it expelled photons no one would have a problem with. Also the maximum force you could get out of it would be F=P/c.

Err no its not explained. The original non peer reviewed paper on the inventors website, uses double speak and arm waving to "show a force". That is not how we do science. There is no credible physics behinds this at all.

Perhaps read some other threats in this post. There are plenty of us. It is not really a surprise that some random internet forum, one that tends to attract wantabe CS "experts", have no fucking idea about physics. Not only that, but won't even bother to read up on it at all.

What do you think is more likely. Everyone for the last 400 years made consistent repeatable mistakes thousands and thousands of times. Or perhaps these 3 "reports" and 2 groups have maybe made the mistake?