Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!
We've improved Slashdot's video section; now you can view our video interviews, product close-ups and site visits with all the usual Slashdot options to comment, share, etc. No more walled garden! It's a work in progress -- we hope you'll check it out (Learn more about the recent updates).
Would this then be best described as an ether, only instead of matter traveling through the ether, matter is manifestations of the ether (fields) itself. Would this also than mean that the motion of matter is not a physical movement of a "particle" but instead the transfer of the "excitement" of a field from one spot of the field to another?
And what, if any, implications does this disocvery have for unifying gravity or other areas of physics?
Where's the problem to warrant your post?
You clearly don't understand evolution. It's not like a mutation that leads to a lion having slightly better heat reduction automatically is spread to all lions everywhere over the course of tens of years. The results of a mutations are usually subtle and accumulated over long periods lead to pronounced changes. You just mostly false statements. You need to educate yourself more about a theory that is supported nearly unanimously by those with meaningful credentials if you choose to allow a bias to presuppose it's falsehood.
Any teacher in a biological science who believes in creationism isn't qualified to teach biology. If they have objections to evolution they should get them published in a legit publication.
Years ago in a related case in Georgia, CNN was interviewing local students and one of them said he agreed with teaching ID in school because even he knew there were flaws in evolution and you could show everyone why it's not true. I was basically screaming at the TV "Well young man. Put it forward. The scientific community eagerly awaits your groundbreaking research and there is without a doubt a prestigious award and a university position available to anyone that can show such pitfalls with evolution"
But we all know the truth. The fundamentalist religious community is full of regurgitated lies and "unthruths" regarding evolution and natural selection and they fill the uniformed minds with these creating a roadblock to true learning. One of the most deceitful and dishonest groups I've ever dealt with are the creationists. They've used quotes as if they were fact even long after the owner of said quote contacted them to state he either didn't say it or it's not even in proper context.
I replied to the guy that won't come to US anymore because of the US's wrongs. He's lives in the freakin' UK!
What are *you* talking about? The collection of wealthy white people and their host nations won that battle long ago. I'm not saying that as a racist sense, I'm saying it as a "that's what happened" sense. And I don't like it. I think the creation of Israel was disgusting. I think it's hypocritical to reward Israel for terrorism by "granting" the country from other people's lands, and then use that same excuse today to not give anything to the people that land was taken from. But that's how it is and it's not an American problem, it's a Western problem.
I'm just really sick of people from Europe throwing crap at America. The entire West is doing the same crap. Some of the most disgusting laws I've seen that erode "freedom" comes from Europe. And the entire West is screwing the Middle East just as much as the people there are screwing themselves.
Per capita, we all (the West) have the same amount of selfish bastards eroding government and influencing legislation for greed. So stop acting like it's an American issue. It's not.Clean up your own hose. Vote in your own honest people for change. We all have the same issues.
The Middle East is backed into a corner, and the US is FAR from alone putting it in that corner.
The sad fact is the West is at war with the Middle East. A war you, as a Brit, should be responsible for since your fucking country started it. But you dropped it our laps. The US is far from perfect, and I'm glad there's people that fight the bad legislation. The US saying, "if you want to come in our airspace, or be cleared to if you have an emergency, then you need to do X" isn't the OMFGZ the posts here are making it out to be.
The entire West is abusing and raping the Middle East, the Middle East is not doing anything about it except bitching at the West with the rare minority resorting to shoving explosives up their ass, and the US gets all the blame. Very convenient. Why don't you take care of your own countries actions that got us into this mess and keep us there before pointing 4 out of 5 fingers back at yourself.
Are there managers that do that BS firing because they don't like people? Yes. Are they the minority? Yes.
Does the private sector have places taht take advantage of IT work force? Absolutely. Does the private sector pay more, yes.
If you're competent and willing to take a little less for the lifestyle differences, there's no problem unless you end up with a poor manager. When in state government I basically use very little time management when running projects as long as people meet expectations otherwise because its one of the few perks I can give. But your post reeks of a single or few experiences. I've seen way too much of government at all different levels to believe I just have seen the exceptions time and time again. Also, you've missed the point of firing certain people. Certain people are not qualified for the job they are in. They don't have the grey matter or the desire or a bad attitude or all the above. When you ask a person that's a
1. Fire people like it was the private sector
2. Pay competitive wages for new hires
What a lot of people don't realize about the gov, especially in IT, is if you take any 5 gov IT employees 2 are underpaid worthless cretins that should lose their job but the manager doesn't have 40 hours a week just to document their deficiencies because he/she is actually working. 2 are making what they're worth but are underskilled for the job and the pay reflects that, and one's a complete stud vastly underpaid and doing hero work to make sure things run. Obviously those numbers aren't exact science, but it's like that in a lot of places.
Now, since they're doing it as cheap as possible, maintenance is almost never factored in except on the biggest projects. The rest they just expect you to suck up with existing resources. And it's a one-off app so maintenance is as needed. Basically, once it's released (or the final release is put out considering a lot is done in iterrations) it's a dead system except when a bug is found. That accounts for the way a lot, but not all, government software is done. Which means, as opposed to a commercial package where a bug found by one customer and fixed by a support team can fix a bug for a 1000 customers, you're in your own fiefdom. Of course that hurts things. When you go to agency to agency, even within a single state or county, everything is done differently, looks differently, named differently. There are no true standards.
That said, almost every big consolidation effort in IT I've seen has failed miserably. Because by law/degree/legislation every single entity of government is so different and has such different rules to follow. Government is BIG. You're talking hundreds of thousands projects and developers and standardizing that is hard. It's a lot easier for Coke-a-Cola to standardize IT then it for all the soft drink makers to standardize IT practices. And government is like the latter x1000. And again, Coke-a-Cola's only going to do something that makes sense from a business standpoint and has a tangible ROI so they do it right to get that ROI (just an example, Coke IT might suck for all I know). Where as the government stuff almost never has an ROI, it's done because it's required to be done and isn't budgeted to be done, just required. With no ROI it's always just a "get it done" attitude. And a lot of stuff is done to make a politician happy so even though he has no idea what really should be done he has final say because he's going to use it to get favors with other politicians or to make a press release and use it for future votes.