And that bullshit about powering on electronics if you're flying to the States? That just got broadened to *all* flights *anywhere*. I knew it was coming, I just didn't expect it within 3 fucking days...
I remember this "war on dead batteries" starting as far back as 1996, after some sort of bomb threat or something. They forced you to fire up your laptop, but only if it wasn't rush hour, and then after about two or three weeks, they stopped doing it because it wasn't worth the effort.
That's why you create two copies: you hand one over to them with password. Second copy, you keep sealed with dual keys, like in a bank locker. You change password on the original and continue your business.
That won't work. They will just subpeona that copy as well.
Where do you draw the line? Some level of badness has to be classified as a fault, some limit on what bulbs must be capable of surviving must be set for the standards. You can't expect stuff to be indestructible (except Model M keyboards, obviously).
I don't want them to be indestructible, but since they cost 10 times as much, it is reasonable to expect that they will last longer, not less long, and that they will be more resilient, not less resilient, and they will produce more light, not less light.
There are less polite terms I want to use instead of "forget 'em."
Here's a free car analogy: scalable websites are like CAFE-required design elements on modern cars. Everything looks the same and ends up less efficient than it could be.
This. And for the ultimate example, I give you Metro. Let's have the same interface across all platforms, and since mobile devices can't do the more efficient input methods, we will instead dumb down the desktop so that it uses the inefficient input methods.
It sounds a lot like the power quality in your house is extremely bad. Have you had other devices fail prematurely?
Well, if bad power is an ongoing problem, then obviously it would be extremely irresponsible of the bulb makers to make them so dependent on clean power and it would be irresponsible of the government to outlaw bulbs that are more tolerant of lower quality power.
We called it Friday.
A question though, how is it that for 364 days you use a backasswards date format that is set to confuse the rest of the human race but this one day you put the day number before the month like everyone else?
I don't know why they choose to have an improper date format on the 4th of July, but not on other days of note. Obviously, they should be using a consistent format that is sortable, such as 20140704. Everybody should be able to understand that and it is least significant to most significant and sorts properly both as a date and as a number.
The only possible interpretation of any research whatever in the `social sciences' is: some do, some don't. -- Ernest Rutherford