Just because someone is a Democrat, does not make one a liberal.

I have gotten fines from the IRS, and it was always because I missed something and it was my fault. Sometimes it took a little work to figure out what the problem was, and even called them up when I was trying to figure it out. The people were never rude and always helpful.

Was I happy with it? No, who really wants to admit they made a mistake and have to pay to fix it? No many people, but you know what? I sucked up my ego, which all it really was, and admitted my mistake and paid up.

For all the scorn people heap on the IRS, they do a very good job, especially considering all the crap they get from anyone who seems them as an easy dog to kick.

As soon as executives are financially responsible for the money they lose or swindle from customers.

It depends on how schizophrenic you are, because sometimes there are bosses that set no expectations, or explanations. If you did then when s**t goes wrong it becomes your fault instead of mine when I follow procedures but stuff does not work out.

It happens in a lot in the real world which is why some people will show no initiative, because there is no point in doing so.

It depends on the marker that they use. If the marker is something that is not as soluble or emulates the characteristic of the fracking recipe. You also have the problem of how they injected the marker versus how they normally proceed. A concern was that they were more careful in projects where they were injecting the marker rather than how they normally do business. Finally, Pennsylvania is not the only place they do fracking different soils and naturally occurring fault lines were major concerns.

If this Dilbert cartoon does not hit the nail on the head, I don't know what does.

That is only because you saw it on Netflix the other night...

I am calling BS, requiring Calculus for Statistics is like saying you need to be a mechanic to understand how to drive a car.

People don't understand Statistics in the first place because they just plug in the formula and it works via magic. If they don't understand the basics of Statistics, they certainly are not going to make the effort to understand Calculus either.

The sampling is only valid for the question posed. If you change the question, you can also change the results. Sometimes even changing the order of the question can ALSO change the results.

To imply that only potential problem with this study is sample bias, you would be wrong.

I understand that 10 years the max, but judges discretion can be vary widely. I would hate to have a couple years of life depending on whether a judge wants to push an agenda instead of being fair.

• The rape is crime
• The hacking exposed a crime, which is being charged as a crime
• The hacking also exposed the government of failing to enforce a crime.

Hacking crimes should be relative based upon scope. Steal $10 you a petty thief; steal $1,000,000 you are a felon. The only reason 10 years is on the there is because someone in the government got embarrassed not because of hacking as a crime.

I was much younger when I was earning $20/hour and $95/hour. Your saying that he should glad with $20/hour while the rate increased to $160/hour.

I fail to see how business expenses drastically increased in the last 15 years, but not increase the salary of the guy doing the actual work hasn't.

Considering I was being paid $20 an hour and when the company I was working for charged $95 an hour. I do believe that there is a problem.

GMO foods are potentially dangerous in several ways. DNA is one way, but the idea that Roundup Ready only kills bad stuff is the most dangerous.

Just like they did with DDT, we are dumping Roundup over everything. We don't even pretend to understand the long-term effects of that decision but "good for the economy/Monsanto".

I guess when it comes to chemicals I am a little bit paranoid.