Actually she has mentioned some vaccine method that were safe.
Poeple against her have come out and said those vaccine distribution methods were safer however they cost most and would make distribution harder.

There was a recent survey among people who do not vacinate their kids and fear of autism was not high.
Top reasons given were:
Would prefer more organic items in the vaccine; or prefer a more natural method of having the kid catch the disease and natural immunization.
That they were in a good area so the kids would not catch anything.
Feat of what "big pharma" is doing, how they are misleading people, and cannot be trusted.

The US Government came out with an idea to do this for terrorist attacks after 9/11 where people with knowledge in the areas of the middle east, various groups and other specialties would be invited to a program they could make forecasts. Those that were correct would have money donated to their university or another organization of their choice.
Liberals came out and called it the idea of a bunch of crazies.

Besides the other false things you have said when did the US Federal Government start requiring car insurance?

The discussion on how it would be allowed by the constitution was a big thing when it was first past. If Obama had followed what is allowed by the Constitution he would not of had the problem he is currently having with it.

Your right because they know what actually happened and the truth behind the banner.

They are kids and this something to get the teachers to spend some time on it verses something like math, reading or spelling.

Name one lawsuit of them goin after a person who had accidental cross pollination and that person did not go out of their way to make use of that fact.

And the majority of those people are part of the idiot, anti-science problem.
take for example a bunch of stupid anti-Monsanto slides that have come out in the past few weeks about how another country banned all of their products. If you go read the real reason you find it was only banned in one portion of th country and only certain products and the reason was that country was afraid of uprising and the products chemicals could be used to make explosives.

This survey has no reflect to the truth it is based on how many false slides got sent around on facebook against the company.

Not a full blown tank but an armored vehicle http://elitedaily.com/news/wor...

Considering how good Molotov cocktail worked on WW 2 tanks would be interesting to see how they do on a modern tank. So if anyone wants to try please do it on an un maned tank and you tube it.

After multiple warning, and then court proceeding it will be seized for failure to pay taxes and then sold. THe amount of money owned will be kept and the rest given to the previous owner.
If you don't own any land you will not have to worry about paying taxes on it.

Please stop repeating this lie, granted it is repeated enough on alot of hate sites. For you it was probably a mistake since you did not know the truth.
Congress want to protect the taxpayer from having to take over the duties that the USPS said they would do,back in the 70s, the postmaster general and the postal unions want to make the taxpayers pay for their poor management and keep things as they are.
The postal accountability law,2006, requires the USPS to actually do some proper financial management and dropping it would not make them competitive again; even ignore the money they owe for this they would of lost money for the last couple of years. Without the money set aside they would not be able the meet the obligations they agreed to back in the 1970s and the people who retiring now would not have the monies that they are suppose to get.
BTW the 75 years is number of years that is for ACCOUNTING purposes they have to figure future liabilities. It is NOT how long they have to fund benefits. That 75 years of accounting is followed by the DoD, social security, department of Housing, etc

Microsoft has been really clear on their end of life policy for probably a decade if not more. The only way to say they have not is if you say all those increases in time they have given are an indication of unclearness.
However with your definition of $100 USD, cost to upgrade OS from XP to Windows 7, as being "an arm and a leg" not to sure about the rest you wrote.