I remember back after 9/11 when everyone and his uncle got their 5 year old to memorize the FCC question pool answers and get their ham radio license...
The real message is: "We're not going to roll out anything new or better unless we can charge premiums for access to it."
They're just conditioning the students to life in a police state.
Does anyone know?
This is nothing more than the thought police grasping at straws trying to project an aura of legitimacy.
People say nasty things to each other. Nobody is more nasty to each other than young women. That is a fact. And, if I had a nickel for every time I overheard a nasty conversation between females at the water cooler about some man, I'd be pretty darn wealthy.
So, let us stop lying to ourselves by saying that gender hostility is a one-way street, shall we? People are people, and people will always say nasty things to each other. The thought police need to get over themselves and learn that the ability to deal with adversity and hostility internally is necessary for survival.
TFA said the car belonged to his girlfriend.
The logical next step is to figure out how to convince the software that you are planning to leave your job (even if you aren't) so your employer will offer you incentives to stay.
Sure, the study itself is not a threat to free speech, but the goal of the study is to enable government to suppress free speech. That much is obvious to anyone with one eyeball not laser-focused on the big pile of taxpayer cash.
I think the word you're looking for is "resolution," not "accuracy."
Dihydrogen monoxide vapor is a far more prevalent and effective greenhouse gas than CO2. Though methane is even more powerful, dihydrogen monoxide wins on overwhelming volume.
CO2 is a red herring. Methane is a red herring. We have to get handle on dihydrogen monoxide emissions if we are to have a prayer of halting global climate change.
Who _didn't_ already know he was gay? Show of hands...
Happiness is twin floppies.