Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Well... (Score 2) 108

I'd point out that in order to run a marathon, you have to train for a marathon. Walking is not a very suitable means of doing this.

When training for a marathon, walking is a very good training step when you are a 1 year old human.
WRT to space flight, we are at the 1 year old human stage. We've taken a couple of hundred 'steps'. Not quite mastered the concept yet.

Comment Re:Just my take (Score 1) 374

If the sperm donor can be positively identified, yes they can go after him.
Kansas, last year. Lesbian couple want a child. They enlist a male friend to provide the sperm.
A couple years later, the female couple breaks up. The custodial mom applies to the state for financial aid. The state goes after the sperm donor for recompense. And gets it in court.
http://www.cnn.com/2014/01/23/...

I believe there was a similar case in Sweden a couple of years ago.

Comment Re:Actually, it *IS* smoother... (Score 1) 170

4 months ago, I upgraded the Verizon FiOS router from the initial crappy one, to a zippy n router. WiFi performance increased significantly. No change from 50/50 needed. And no need to speak to a Verizon rep. Just order it online, it arrives in the mail, done.
And the $100 payment was spread across 3 months of Verizon bills.

Comment Re:I will never understand (Score 1) 104

It would actually be worse. If I had to pay the legal fees of X Corp if I lost, I'd probably be far less inclined to take them to court.
Currently, all I'd have to pay is my legal fee, and whatever fine may be imposed.

If I had to pay their legal fee as well...I'd probably think twice.

5 corporate law talking guys x 2 weeks x $200/hour each....a single individual would be screwed if he lost.
Now..if we stipulate that the 'winner' gets no more 'legal fees' than the loser paid to his legal team....that might be different. But that brings its own issues.

Comment Re:Drug dogs (Score 1) 409

Possibly because a lot of people have drugs or drug residue on them?
I am in no way saying that cops never plant. Not even a little bit. I'm quite sure they do.
But a lot of people do actually have drugs on them or in the car.

That leads to a whole different discussion of "If so many people do it, why is it still illegal?"

Slashdot Top Deals

8 Catfish = 1 Octo-puss

Working...